A comparison of two fitness programs to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease in public safety officers

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of a fitness program designed as an alternative to the standard weight-training and running program and using limited resources and facilities. Forty-three men from the North Carolina Justice Academy, randomly assigned into two groups, completed 12 weeks of physical training. The WT group used a standard weight training and running, whereas the REC group ran and completed a resistive exercise circuit. The REC circuit consisted of nine exercises designed to improve muscular strength and endurance separated by 30 seconds of aerobic exercise. The exercises used chairs, tables, sawhorses, and body weight to provide the resistance. The results indicated that the REC program improved muscular strength and aerobic capacity as well as the WT program. Furthermore, the REC group lost more weight, reduced body fat, and improved their lipid profiles significantly more than the WT group. Thus, the REC program is a viable alternative for the training of public safety officers when only limited resources are available.