Effects of transducer mass on intramuscular temperature during ultrasound treatments
- PMID: 23921251
- DOI: 10.1123/jsr.22.4.296
Effects of transducer mass on intramuscular temperature during ultrasound treatments
Abstract
Context: A potential variable that could affect rate of temperature elevation with ultrasound is the pressure (mass) that is applied to the transducer head during application. Added pressure could compress the tissue, affecting density and the transmission of ultrasound energy. Little research has been completed to determine the effects of the amount of pressure applied during therapeutic ultrasound in vivo.
Objective: To determine the effects of different applied transducer mass on intramuscular temperature during an ultrasound treatment within the left triceps surae.
Design: Crossover clinical trial.
Setting: Human performance research laboratory.
Participants: Convenience sample of thirteen healthy, college-age students.
Interventions: Three separate 3-MHz, 1.0-W/cm2 ultrasound treatments were administered 1.5 cm within the triceps surae. The independent variables were the linear temperature standards (0.5°C, 1.0°C, 1.5°C, and 2.0°C above baseline) and the 3 different applied pressures measured in grams (200 g, 600 g, and 800 g).
Main outcome measures: A thermocouple probe was used to measure triceps surae temperature, and time to reach the temperature standards was recorded during the ultrasound treatments. A 4 × 3 repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences for temperature points (0.5°C, 1.0°C, 1.5°C, and 2.0°C) and transducer mass (200 g, 600 g, and 800 g) and with respect to time.
Results: The results of the RM-ANOVA showed no temperature-point and transducer-mass interaction (F6,72 = 1.69, P = .137) or main effect for mass (F2,24 = 1.23, P = .309). The time required to raise temperature 2°C was 209.1 ± 68.10 s at 200 g, 181.5 ± 61.50 s at 600 g, and 194.9 ± 75.54 s at 800 g.
Conclusions: Under the conditions of this study, the amount of mass applied with the transducer during an ultrasound treatment does not ultimately affect the rate of tissue heating.
Similar articles
-
Effect of transducer velocity on intramuscular temperature during a 1-MHz ultrasound treatment.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;36(5):320-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2157. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006. PMID: 16715832
-
Intramuscular Heating Characteristics of Multihour Low-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound.J Athl Train. 2015 Nov;50(11):1158-64. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.11.03. Epub 2015 Oct 28. J Athl Train. 2015. PMID: 26509683 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Dynatron Solaris® Ultrasound Machine: Slower Heating Than Textbook Recommendations at 3 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2.J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Jan 1;27(1):22-29. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0173. Epub 2018 Jan 18. J Sport Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 27992304
-
A comparison of human muscle temperature increases during 3-MHz continuous and pulsed ultrasound with equivalent temporal average intensities.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Jul;34(7):395-401. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.7.395. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004. PMID: 15296367 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of ReBound Diathermy as a Thermal Heating Agent: A Critically Appraised Topic.J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;28(6):656-659. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0034. J Sport Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 29952697 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous