A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- PMID: 23921339
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546513497926
A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either the double-bundle or single-bundle technique with hamstring tendon autografts in an unselected group of patients.
Hypothesis: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction will render a better outcome on the pivot-shift test.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A randomized series of 103 patients (33 women, 70 men; median age, 27 years; range, 18-52 years) with a unilateral ACL rupture underwent anatomic ACL reconstruction. The double-bundle technique was used in 53 patients, and the single-bundle technique was used in 50 patients. The ACL footprint was visualized, and the femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal; interference screw fixation was used at both ends. The patients were examined preoperatively and at a median of 26 months (range, 22-42 months) after the reconstruction by a blinded observer. The primary variable was the pivot-shift test.
Results: At 2-year follow-up, 98 patients (93%) were examined. Clinical assessments at follow-up revealed no significant differences between the double-bundle and single-bundle groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test, range of motion, Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS), 1-legged hop test, and square hop test. A significant improvement was seen in both groups compared with the preoperative values in terms of most clinical assessments.
Conclusion: In this prospective randomized study, the primary variable, the pivot-shift test, and other subjective and objective outcome variables revealed no significant differences between the double-bundle and single-bundle techniques at 2 years after ACL reconstruction in an unselected group of patients.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; double-bundle; randomized controlled trial; reconstruction; single-bundle.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1225-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546515626543. Epub 2016 Mar 6. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26948548 Clinical Trial.
-
Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Not Superior to Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction at 10-Year Follow-up: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3477-3486. doi: 10.1177/03635465221128566. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 36269582 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):512-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546511426416. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22085729 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-bundle or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Knee. 2014. PMID: 23306028 Review.
-
Metallic or bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction?Br Med Bull. 2014;109:19-29. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldt038. Epub 2013 Dec 18. Br Med Bull. 2014. PMID: 24357733 Review.
Cited by
-
The Relationship between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Osteoarthritis of the Knee.Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:928301. doi: 10.1155/2015/928301. Epub 2015 Apr 19. Adv Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25954533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Subjective assessment reported by patients shows differences between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94868-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34321559 Free PMC article.
-
Tibial ACL insertion site length: correlation between preoperative MRI and intra-operative measurements.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep;24(9):2787-2793. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3473-8. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 25516170 Clinical Trial.
-
High Rate of Initially Overlooked Kaplan Fiber Complex Injuries in Patients With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2117-2124. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015682. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34086492 Free PMC article.
-
Double and Single Bundle in Athletes: A Comparison in Medium and Long-Term Rates to Return to Sport and Re-Injury.Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(1):19-25. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.66143.3168. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024. PMID: 38318301 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical