Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects
- PMID: 23921510
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0496-y
Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects
Abstract
Spatio-temporal interactions between simple geometrical shapes typically elicit strong impressions of intentionality. Recent research has started to explore the link between attentional processes and the detection of interacting objects. Here, we asked whether visual attention is biased toward such interactions. We investigated probe discrimination performance in algorithmically generated animations that involved two chasing objects and two randomly moving objects. In Experiment 1, we observed a pronounced attention capture effect for chasing objects. Because reduced interobject spacing is an inherent feature of interacting objects, in Experiment 2 we designed randomly moving objects that were matched to the chasing objects with respect to interobject spacing at probe onset. In this experiment, the capture effect attenuated completely. Therefore, we argue that reduced interobject spacing reflects an efficient cue to guide visual attention toward objects that interact intentionally.
Similar articles
-
Perceptual animacy: visual search for chasing objects among distractors.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):702-17. doi: 10.1037/a0034846. Epub 2013 Dec 2. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014. PMID: 24294872
-
Not FLEXible enough: Exploring the temporal dynamics of attentional reallocations with the multiple object tracking paradigm.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):776-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000187. Epub 2015 Dec 21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016. PMID: 26689311
-
Linking perceptual animacy to attention: evidence from the chasing detection paradigm.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):1003-15. doi: 10.1037/a0030839. Epub 2012 Nov 26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013. PMID: 23181685
-
Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):926-38. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.926. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20436190
-
Selecting and tracking multiple objects.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;6(2):109-118. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1328. Epub 2014 Dec 15. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015. PMID: 26263067 Review.
Cited by
-
Life is in motion (through a chick's eye).Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):129-140. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01703-8. Epub 2022 Oct 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36222937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pursuit tracks chase: exploring the role of eye movements in the detection of chasing.PeerJ. 2015 Sep 15;3:e1243. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1243. eCollection 2015. PeerJ. 2015. PMID: 26401454 Free PMC article.
-
Realistic and complex visual chasing behaviors trigger the perception of intentionality.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284485. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37058466 Free PMC article.
-
Goal attribution to inanimate moving objects by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 5;7:40033. doi: 10.1038/srep40033. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28053305 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of animacy in dogs and humans.Biol Lett. 2017 Jun;13(6):20170156. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0156. Biol Lett. 2017. PMID: 28659418 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources