Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy
- PMID: 23922480
- PMCID: PMC3732855
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4799
Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy
Abstract
Aim: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixed-effects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used.
Results: The initial search identified 10 publications. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 - -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59].
Conclusion: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.
Keywords: Hemorrhoids; Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy; Meta-analysis; Stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids in adults.Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):914-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Jul 19. Int J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23876770
-
Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Aug;24(4):285-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000009. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014. PMID: 24732739 Review.
-
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011502. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30024532 Free PMC article. Review.
-
LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Aug;53(8):1161-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e1a1e9. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010. Retraction in: Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1151. doi: 10.1097/01.dcr.0000453521.88176.59. PMID: 20628280 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
The prevalence of incontinence after excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109139. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109139. Epub 2025 Jan 23. Surgery. 2025. PMID: 39854786
Cited by
-
Retrospective analysis of mepivacaine, prilocaine and chloroprocaine for low-dose spinal anaesthesia in outpatient perianal procedures.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3085-8. Epub 2018 May 13. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 29756162
-
Development and validation of a practical score to predict pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;29(11):1401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1999-3. Epub 2014 Aug 26. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 25155619
-
Tissue selecting technique mega-window stapler combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation for the treatment of severe prolapsed hemorrhoids: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23122. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023122. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33157990 Free PMC article.
-
Necrotizing fasciitis--a sinister complication of hemorrhoidectomy.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jun;30(6):851-2. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2050-4. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25367181 No abstract available.
-
Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1301-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1087-5. Epub 2014 May 10. Indian J Surg. 2015. PMID: 27011555 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, Papeš D, Altarac S. A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:58–61. - PubMed
-
- Cohen Z. Symposium on outpatient anorectal procedures. Alternatives to surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Can J Surg. 1985;28:230–231. - PubMed
-
- Cataldo P, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk S, Hyman N, Buie WD, Church J, Cohen J, Fleshner P, Kilkenny J, Ko C, et al. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised) Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:189–194. - PubMed
-
- Milligan ETC, Naunton Morgan C, Jones L, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;230:1119–1124.
-
- Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959;2:176–179. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical