Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4799-807.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4799.

Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy

Affiliations
Review

Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy

Jun Yang et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) by a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to December 2012, were searched. The main outcomes measured were operating time, early postoperative pain, postoperative urinary retention and bleeding, wound problems, gas or fecal incontinence, anal stenosis, length of hospital stay, residual skin tags, prolapse, and recurrence. The meta-analysis was performed using the free software Review Manager. Differences observed between the two groups were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with 95%CI. A fixed-effects model was used to pool data when statistical heterogeneity was not present. If statistical heterogeneity was present (P < 0.05), a random-effects model was used.

Results: The initial search identified 10 publications. After screening, five RCTs published as full articles were included in this meta-analysis. Among the five studies, all described a comparison of the patient baseline characteristics and showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although most of the analyzed outcomes were similar between the two operative techniques, the operating time for SH was significantly longer than for LH (P < 0.00001; OR= -6.39, 95%CI: -7.68 - -5.10). The incidence of residual skin tags and prolapse was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/111 (1.8%) vs 16/105 (15.2%); P = 0.0004; OR= 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.45). The incidence of recurrence after the procedures was significantly lower in the LH group than in the SH group [2/173 (1.2%) vs 13/174 (7.5%); P = 0.003; OR= 0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.59].

Conclusion: Both SH and LH are probably equally valuable techniques in modern hemorrhoid surgery. However, LigaSure might have slightly favorable immediate postoperative results and technical advantages.

Keywords: Hemorrhoids; Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy; Meta-analysis; Stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search protocol for the meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of outcome between LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy. A: Operating time; B: Early postoperative pain; C: Postoperative urinary; D: Postoperative bleeding; E: Wound problems; F: Postoperative gas or fecal incontinence; G: Postoperative anal stenosis; H: Hospitalization; I: Residual skin tags and prolapse; J: Recurrence. LH: LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy SH: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, Papeš D, Altarac S. A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:58–61. - PubMed
    1. Cohen Z. Symposium on outpatient anorectal procedures. Alternatives to surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Can J Surg. 1985;28:230–231. - PubMed
    1. Cataldo P, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk S, Hyman N, Buie WD, Church J, Cohen J, Fleshner P, Kilkenny J, Ko C, et al. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised) Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:189–194. - PubMed
    1. Milligan ETC, Naunton Morgan C, Jones L, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;230:1119–1124.
    1. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959;2:176–179. - PubMed

MeSH terms