Larger body size at metamorphosis enhances survival, growth and performance of young cane toads (Rhinella marina)
- PMID: 23922930
- PMCID: PMC3726449
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070121
Larger body size at metamorphosis enhances survival, growth and performance of young cane toads (Rhinella marina)
Abstract
Body size at metamorphosis is a key trait in species (such as many anurans) with biphasic life-histories. Experimental studies have shown that metamorph size is highly plastic, depending upon larval density and environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, food supply, water quality, chemical cues from conspecifics, predators and competitors). To test the hypothesis that this developmental plasticity is adaptive, or to determine if inducing plasticity can be used to control an invasive species, we need to know whether or not a metamorphosing anuran's body size influences its subsequent viability. For logistical reasons, there are few data on this topic under field conditions. We studied cane toads (Rhinella marina) within their invasive Australian range. Metamorph body size is highly plastic in this species, and our laboratory studies showed that larger metamorphs had better locomotor performance (both on land and in the water), and were more adept at catching and consuming prey. In mark-recapture trials in outdoor enclosures, larger body size enhanced metamorph survival and growth rate under some seasonal conditions. Larger metamorphs maintained their size advantage over smaller siblings for at least a month. Our data support the critical but rarely-tested assumption that all else being equal, larger body size at metamorphosis is likely to enhance an individual's long term viability. Thus, manipulations to reduce body size at metamorphosis in cane toads may help to reduce the ecological impact of this invasive species.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Laurie WA, Brown D (1990) Population biology of marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). II. Changes in annual survival rates and the effects of size, sex, age and fecundity in a population crash. J Anim Ecol 59: 529–544.
-
- Janzen FJ (1993) An experimental analysis of natural selection on body size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 74: 332–341.
-
- Sorci G, Clobert J (1999) Natural selection on hatchling body size and mass in two environments in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Evol Ecol Res 1: 303–316.
-
- Shine R (1991) Why do larger snakes eat larger prey items? Funct Ecol 5: 493–502.
-
- Forsman A (1996) Body size and net energy gain in gape-limited predators: a model. J Herpetol 30: 307–319.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
