Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):342-5.
doi: 10.4293/108680813X13654754534233.

Novel approach to rectal foreign body extraction

Affiliations
Case Reports

Novel approach to rectal foreign body extraction

Yury Bak et al. JSLS. 2013 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The impacted rectal foreign body often poses a management challenge. Ideally, such objects are removed in the emergency department utilizing a combination of local anesthesia, sedation, minimal instrumentation, and manual extraction. In some instances, simple manual extraction is unsuccessful and general anesthesia may be necessary. We describe a novel approach to retrieval and removal of a rectal foreign body utilizing a SILS port.

Case description: A 31-y-old male presented to the emergency department approximately 12 h after transanal insertion of a plastic cigar case. Abdominal examination revealed no evidence of peritonitis. On rectal examination, the tip of the cigar case was palpable. The foreign body, however, was unable to be removed manually in the emergency department. In the operating room, with the patient under general anesthesia, multiple attempts to remove the object were unsuccessful. A SILS port was inserted transanally. The rectum was then insufflated manually by attaching the diaphragm of the rigid sigmoidoscope to the SILS insufflation port. A 5-mm 0-degree laparoscope was placed through the SILS port. An atraumatic laparoscopic grasper was then placed through the port and used to grasp the visible end of the cigar case. The rectal foreign body was removed expeditiously. Direct visualization of the rectum revealed no evidence of mucosal injury. The patient was discharged home shortly after the procedure.

Discussion: The SILS port allows minimally invasive extraction of rectal foreign bodies not amenable to simple manual extraction. It provides excellent visualization and eliminates the morbidity inherent in more invasive and traditional methods of retrieval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Abdominal radiograph of rectal foreign body (arrow).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Transanal placement of SILS port with patient in the lithotomy position.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Visualization of distal aspect of rectal foreign body with 5-mm, 0-degree laparoscopic through SILS port.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldberg JE, Steele SR. Rectal foreign bodies. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:173–184 - PubMed
    1. Sharma H, Banka S, Walton R, Memon MA. A novel technique for nonoperative removal of round rectal foreign bodies. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11:58–59 - PubMed
    1. Andrabi SI, Johnson NA, Malik AH, Ahmed M. Extraction of a rectal foreign body: an alternative method. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009;15:403–405 - PubMed
    1. Levin SE, Cooperman H, Freilich M, Lomas M. The use of a curved uterine vulsellum for removal of rectal foreign bodies: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20:532–533 - PubMed
    1. Peet TN. Removal of impacted rectal foreign body with obstetric forceps. BMJ. 1976;1:500–501 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types