Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jul 24:7:657-67.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S45575. Print 2013.

Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Benchalak Maneeton et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior.

Methods: A 7-day prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2009 to April 2011 in medically ill patients with delirium. Measures used for daily assessment included the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and total sleep time. The Clinical Global Impression, Improvement (CGI-I) and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson- Angus Scale were applied daily. The primary outcome was the DRS-R-98 severity scores. The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: Fifty-two subjects (35 males and 17 females) were randomized to receive 25-100 mg/day of quetiapine (n = 24) or 0.5-2.0 mg/day of haloperidol (n = 28). Mean (standard deviation) doses of quetiapine and haloperidol were 67.6 (9.7) and 0.8 (0.3) mg/day, respectively. Over the trial period, means (standard deviation) of the DRS-R-98 severity scores were not significantly different between the quetiapine and haloperidol groups (-22.9 [6.9] versus -21.7 [6.7]; P = 0.59). The DRS-R-98 noncognitive and cognitive subscale scores were not significantly different. At end point, the response and remission rates, the total sleep time, and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson-Angus scores were also not significantly different between groups. Hypersomnia was common in the quetiapine-treated patients (33.3%), but not significantly higher than that in the haloperidol-treated group (21.4%).

Limitations: Patients were excluded if they were not able to take oral medications, and the sample size was small.

Conclusion: Low-dose quetiapine and haloperidol may be equally effective and safe for controlling delirium symptoms.

Clinical trials registration number: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00954603.

Keywords: delirium; extrapyramidal symptoms; haloperidol; quetiapine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for the study enrollment and completion of delirious patients. Note: *The cause of death was related to underlying malignancy with sepsis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean difference of DRS-R-98 severity score from baseline over time after treatment with quetiapine or haloperidol groups (ITT population). Abbreviations: DRS-R-98 severity score, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 severity score; ITT, intent-to-treat analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean difference of DRS-R-98 noncognitive subscale scores from baseline over time after treatment with quetiapine or haloperidol groups (ITT population). Abbreviations: DRS-R-98 noncognitive subscale scores, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 noncognitive subscale scores; ITT, intent-to-treat analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean difference of DRS-R-98 cognitive subscale scores from baseline over time after treatment with quetiapine or haloperidol groups (ITT population). Abbreviations: DRS-R-98 cognitive subscale scores, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 cognitive subscale scores; ITT, intent-to-treat analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean difference of total sleep time (hours) from baseline over time after treatment with quetiapine or haloperidol groups (ITT population). Abbreviation: ITT, intent-to-treat analysis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of first-day response in delirious patients. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of first-day remission in delirious patients. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Burns A, Gallagley A, Byrne J. Delirium. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(3):362–367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maneeton B, Khemawichanurat W, Maneeton N. Consultation-liaison psychiatry in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;8(2):124–130.
    1. Siddiqi N, House AO, Holmes JD. Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. Age Ageing. 2006;35(4):350–364. - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Rushing JT, Foreman MD, Palmer RM, Pompei P. Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiologic study. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(4):234–242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. González M, Martínez G, Calderón J, et al. Impact of delirium on short-term mortality in elderly inpatients: a prospective cohort study. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(3):234–238. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data