Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;20(1):14-32.
doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12020.

Making a Case for Treatment Integrity as a Psychosocial Treatment Quality Indicator for Youth Mental Health Care

Affiliations

Making a Case for Treatment Integrity as a Psychosocial Treatment Quality Indicator for Youth Mental Health Care

Bryce D McLeod et al. Clin Psychol (New York). 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Measures of treatment integrity are needed to advance clinical research in general and are viewed as particularly relevant for dissemination and implementation research. Although some efforts to develop such measures are underway, a conceptual and methodological framework will help guide these efforts. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how frameworks adapted from the psychosocial treatment, therapy process, healthcare, and business literatures can be used to address this gap. We propose that components of treatment integrity (i.e., adherence, differentiation, competence, alliance, client involvement) pulled from the treatment technology and process literatures can be used as quality indicators of treatment implementation and thereby guide quality improvement efforts in practice settings. Further, we discuss how treatment integrity indices can be used in feedback systems that utilize benchmarking to expedite the process of translating evidence-based practices to service settings.

Keywords: children's mental health; dissemination and implementation research; evidence-based treatments; treatment integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of treatment implementation within a quality of care framework.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . 2006 National healthcare disparities report (AHRQ Publication No. 07-0012) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Rockville, MD: 2006.
    1. Anker MG, Duncan BL, Sparks JA. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;77(4):693–704. doi:10.1037/a0016062. - PubMed
    1. Baer S, Garland EJ. Pilot study of community-based cognitive behavioral group therapy for adolescents with social phobia. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2005;44(3):258–264. doi:10.1097/00004583-200503000-00010. - PubMed
    1. Barber JP, Sharpless BA, Klostermann S, McCarthy KS. Assessing intervention competence and its relation to therapy outcome: A selected review derived from the outcome literature. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2007;38(5):493–500. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.493.
    1. Barrington J, Prior M, Richardson M, Allen K. Effectiveness of CBT versus standard treatment for childhood anxiety disorders in a community clinic setting. Behaviour Change. 2005;22(1):29–43. doi:10.1375/bech.22.1.29.66786.

LinkOut - more resources