Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;16(2):130-6.

A perspective from the practice of swaddling by Turkish mothers

Ae Yilmaz  1 , Ns Unsal, N Celik, M Karabel, Ea Keskin, S Tan, S Aldemir
Affiliations

A perspective from the practice of swaddling by Turkish mothers

Ae Yilmaz et al. Hippokratia. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the practice of swaddling by Turkish mothers residing in different areas of the country (rural or urban), and determine to their level of knowledge on its positive and negative effects on children's health.

Material and methods: A total of 632 mothers with an infant aged 0-3 months who presented to our University Hospital volunteered their participation and 598 mothers were included in the study. The study was based on a questionnaire form given to the mothers.

Results: Two hundred eighty three (283) mothers swaddled their infants (47.3 %), while 315 mothers did not swaddle (52.7%). The mothers that swaddled their baby cited tradition ("That's what I learned from my elders") as the most common reason (38%) for swaddling. The most important reason (32%) for not swaddling was the mothers' belief "that it would prevent normal development".

Conclusion: In Turkey, the swaddling tends to decrease with the increase of maternal education level and socio-economic situation.The level of Turkish mother's knowledge about beneficial and adverse effect of swaddling were insufficient.We think that the information about properly swaddling should be given to mothers In order to benefit from it's positive effects and at the same time and avoid its adverse effects.

Keywords: child care; swaddling; traditional methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

APPENDIX 1.
APPENDIX 1.. QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of reasons for swaddling (More than one answer could be given, which is why n has folded).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of reasons for not swaddling (More than one answer could be given, which is why n has folded).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Tendency to swaddle, according to some demographic properties (y axis shows the number of participants with a tendency to swaddle).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Liu JH. Generational comparison of paternal child-rearing attitudes and behaviors in Shangai. Psychology. 1995;18:211–215.
    1. Ho DYF, Kang TK. International comparisons of child-rearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong. Dev Psychol. 1984;20:1004–1016.
    1. Karp H. The Happiest Baby on the Block. London, United Kingdom. Penguin Group. 2002
    1. Masataka N. On the function of swaddling as traditional infant care practiced by native South Americans. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1996;67:285–291. - PubMed
    1. 1983 Turkish Population and Health Survey. Ankara. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. 1987

LinkOut - more resources