Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e71174.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071174. Print 2013.

Virologic and immunologic response to cART by HIV-1 subtype in the CASCADE collaboration

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Virologic and immunologic response to cART by HIV-1 subtype in the CASCADE collaboration

Giota Touloumi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare rates of virologic response and CD4 changes after combination antiretroviral (cART) initiation in individuals infected with B and specific non-B HIV subtypes.

Methods: Using CASCADE data we analyzed HIV-RNA and CD4 counts for persons infected ≥1996, ≥15 years of age. We used survival and longitudinal modeling to estimate probabilities of virologic response (confirmed HIV-RNA <500 c/ml), and failure (HIV-RNA>500 c/ml at 6 months or ≥1000 c/ml following response) and CD4 increase after cART initiation.

Results: 2003 (1706 B, 142 CRF02_AG, 55 A, 53 C, 47 CRF01_AE) seroconverters were included in analysis. There was no evidence of subtype effect overall for response or failure (p = 0.075 and 0.317, respectively) although there was a suggestion that those infected with subtypes CRF01_AE and A responded sooner than those with subtype B infection [HR (95% CI):1.37 (1.01-1.86) and 1.29 (0.96-1.72), respectively]. Rates of CD4 increase were similar in all subtypes except subtype A, which tended to have lower initial, but faster long-term, increases.

Conclusions: Virologic and immunologic response to cART was similar across all studied subtypes but statistical power was limited by the rarity of some non-B subtypes. Current antiretroviral agents seem to have similar efficacy in subtype B and most widely encountered non-B infections in high-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of initial virologic response (A) and virologic failure (B) by HIV-1 subtype.
Numbers below each subfigure indicate numbers of individuals “at risk” (i.e. subjects not responded (A) or failed (B) and under follow-up).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observed (A) and predicted (B) CD4 cell count by HIV-1 subtype.
A: Median profiles (numbers on top indicate individuals contributing measurements at each time point), B: based on a piecewise linear mixed model (Non acute infection, without AIDS at cART initiation, boosted PI cART, SC to cART>4 years, previously naïve, 5 log10 c/ml initial viral load, men having sex with men, 30 years old at cART initiation).

References

    1. Sharp PM, Hahn BH (2010) The evolution of HIV-1 and the origin of AIDS. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 2487–2494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geretti AM (2006) HIV-1 subtypes: epidemiology and significance for HIV management. Curr Opin Infect Dis 19: 1–7. - PubMed
    1. Tebit DM, Nankya I, Arts EJ, Gao Y (2007) HIV diversity, recombination and disease progression: how does fitness “fit” into the puzzle? AIDS Rev 9: 75–87. - PubMed
    1. Hemelaar J, Gouws E, Ghys PD, Osmanov S (2011) Global trends in molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 during 2000–2007. AIDS 25: 679–689. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal RB, Chakrabarti S, Yang C (2005) Impact of genetic diversity of HIV-1 on diagnosis, antiretroviral therapy & vaccine development. Indian J Med Res 121: 287–314. - PubMed

Publication types