Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Aug 13:11:138.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-138.

The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control

Andreas Schmitt et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Though several questionnaires on self-care and regimen adherence have been introduced, the evaluations do not always report consistent and substantial correlations with measures of glycaemic control. Small ability to explain variance in HbA1c constitutes a significant limitation of an instrument's use for scientific purposes as well as clinical practice. In order to assess self-care activities which can predict glycaemic control, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) was designed.

Methods: A 16 item questionnaire to assess self-care activities associated with glycaemic control was developed, based on theoretical considerations and a process of empirical improvements. Four subscales, 'Glucose Management' (GM), 'Dietary Control' (DC), 'Physical Activity' (PA), and 'Health-Care Use' (HU), as well as a 'Sum Scale' (SS) as a global measure of self-care were derived. To evaluate its psychometric quality, 261 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were assessed with the DSMQ and an established analogous scale, the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA). The DSMQ's item and scale characteristics as well as factorial and convergent validity were analysed, and its convergence with HbA1c was compared to the SDSCA.

Results: The items showed appropriate characteristics (mean item-total-correlation: 0.46 ± 0.12; mean correlation with HbA1c: -0.23 ± 0.09). Overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was good (0.84), consistencies of the subscales were acceptable (GM: 0.77; DC: 0.77; PA: 0.76; HU: 0.60). Principal component analysis indicated a four factor structure and confirmed the designed scale structure. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated appropriate fit of the four factor model. The DSMQ scales showed significant convergent correlations with their parallel SDSCA scales (GM: 0.57; DC: 0.52; PA: 0.58; HU: n/a; SS: 0.57) and HbA1c (GM: -0.39; DC: -0.30; PA: -0.15; HU: -0.22; SS: -0.40). All correlations with HbA1c were significantly stronger than those obtained with the SDSCA.

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that the DSMQ is a reliable and valid instrument and enables an efficient assessment of self-care behaviours associated with glycaemic control. The questionnaire should be valuable for scientific analyses as well as clinical use in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Spellman CW. Achieving glycemic control: cornerstone in the treatment of patients with multiple metabolic risk factors. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109(Suppl 5):8–13. - PubMed
    1. Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P, Cull CA, Holman RR, Egger M, Krähenbühl S, Diem P. Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2006;152:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akalin S, Berntorp K, Ceriello A, Das AK, Kilpatrick ES, Koblik T, Munichoodappa CS, Pan CY, Rosenthall W, Shestakova M, Wolnik B, Woo V, Yang WY, Yilmaz MT. Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control. Intensive glucose therapy and clinical implications of recent data: a consensus statement from the Global Task Force on Glycaemic Control. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1421–1425. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02165.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson SB. Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1658–1867. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.11.1658. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albisser AM, Harris RI, Albisser JB, Sperlich M. The impact of initiatives in education, self-management training, and computer-assisted self-care on outcomes in diabetes disease management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3:571–579. doi: 10.1089/15209150152811199. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances