Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 9:21:62.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-62.

Evaluation of emergency department performance - a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures

Christian Michel Sørup  1 , Peter Jacobsen, Jakob Lundager Forberg
Affiliations

Evaluation of emergency department performance - a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures

Christian Michel Sørup et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of emergency department (ED) performance remains a difficult task due to the lack of consensus on performance measures that reflects high quality, efficiency, and sustainability.

Aim: To describe, map, and critically evaluate which performance measures that the published literature regard as being most relevant in assessing overall ED performance.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of review articles reporting accentuated ED performance measures was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria includes: 1) the main purpose was to discuss, analyse, or promote performance measures best reflecting ED performance, 2) the article was a review article, and 3) the article reported macro-level performance measures, thus reflecting an overall departmental performance level.

Results: A number of articles addresses this study's objective (n = 14 of 46 unique hits). Time intervals and patient-related measures were dominant in the identified performance measures in review articles from US, UK, Sweden and Canada. Length of stay (LOS), time between patient arrival to initial clinical assessment, and time between patient arrivals to admission were highlighted by the majority of articles. Concurrently, "patients left without being seen" (LWBS), unplanned re-attendance within a maximum of 72 hours, mortality/morbidity, and number of unintended incidents were the most highlighted performance measures that related directly to the patient. Performance measures related to employees were only stated in two of the 14 included articles.

Conclusions: A total of 55 ED performance measures were identified. ED time intervals were the most recommended performance measures followed by patient centeredness and safety performance measures. ED employee related performance measures were rarely mentioned in the investigated literature. The study's results allow for advancement towards improved performance measurement and standardised assessment across EDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart of article selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Top 25% of highlighted performance measures in included literature.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alberti G. Transforming emergency care in England. 2005. http://aace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Transforming-Emergency-Car....
    1. Danish Health and Medicines Authority. Styrket akutberedskab - planlægningsgrundlag for det regionale sundhedsvæsen. 2007. http://www.sst.dk/publ/publ2007/plan/akutberedskab/styrketakutberedskab.pdf.
    1. Solberg LI, Asplin BR, Weinick RM, Magid DJ. Emergency department crowding: consensus development of potential measures. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(6):824–834. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00816-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walley P, Silvester K, Mountford S. Health-care process improvement decisions: a systems perspective. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2006;19(1):93–104. doi: 10.1108/09526860610642618. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shetty A, Gunja N, Byth K, Vukasovic M. Senior streaming assessment further evaluation after Triage zone: a novel model of care encompassing various emergency department throughput measures. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24(4):374–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2012.01550.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources