Bringing values and deliberation to science communication
- PMID: 23940350
- PMCID: PMC3752165
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110
Bringing values and deliberation to science communication
Abstract
Decisions always involve both facts and values, whereas most science communication focuses only on facts. If science communication is intended to inform decisions, it must be competent with regard to both facts and values. Public participation inevitably involves both facts and values. Research on public participation suggests that linking scientific analysis to public deliberation in an iterative process can help decision making deal effectively with both facts and values. Thus, linked analysis and deliberation can be an effective tool for science communication. However, challenges remain in conducting such process at the national and global scales, in enhancing trust, and in reconciling diverse values.
Keywords: analytic deliberation; climate change; environmental decision making; trust in science.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press; 2005.
-
- Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R. Driving the human ecological footprint. Front Ecol Environ. 2007;5(1):13–18.
-
- United Nations Environment Programme . Global Environmental Outlook 5. New York: United Nations Environment Programme; 2012.
-
- Rosa EA, Dietz T. Human drivers of national greenhouse gas emissions. Nat Clim Chang. 2012;2(8):581–586.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources