Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 6;8(8):e70803.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070803. Print 2013.

Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults

Affiliations

Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults

Tiffany L Weir et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In this study we used stool profiling to identify intestinal bacteria and metabolites that are differentially represented in humans with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to healthy controls to identify how microbial functions may influence CRC development. Stool samples were collected from healthy adults (n = 10) and colorectal cancer patients (n = 11) prior to colon resection surgery at the University of Colorado Health-Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins, CO. The V4 region of the 16s rRNA gene was pyrosequenced and both short chain fatty acids and global stool metabolites were extracted and analyzed utilizing Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). There were no significant differences in the overall microbial community structure associated with the disease state, but several bacterial genera, particularly butyrate-producing species, were under-represented in the CRC samples, while a mucin-degrading species, Akkermansia muciniphila, was about 4-fold higher in CRC (p<0.01). Proportionately higher amounts of butyrate were seen in stool of healthy individuals while relative concentrations of acetate were higher in stools of CRC patients. GC-MS profiling revealed higher concentrations of amino acids in stool samples from CRC patients and higher poly and monounsaturated fatty acids and ursodeoxycholic acid, a conjugated bile acid in stool samples from healthy adults (p<0.01). Correlative analysis between the combined datasets revealed some potential relationships between stool metabolites and certain bacterial species. These associations could provide insight into microbial functions occurring in a cancer environment and will help direct future mechanistic studies. Using integrated "omics" approaches may prove a useful tool in identifying functional groups of gastrointestinal bacteria and their associated metabolites as novel therapeutic and chemopreventive targets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Using the 3% genetic distance, we observed no clustering of samples according to total stool microbial communities based on disease status of the sample donor using either the unweighted measure Jaccard similarity (A) or the weighted ThetaYC distance (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phyla-level microbial classification of bacteria from individual stool samples.
H sample numbers indicate samples from healthy adults while the C designation signifies samples from colon cancer patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The relative proportion of bacterially-produced short chain fatty acids (SCFA) differed significantly between stool of healthy adults and individuals with CRC.
Acetic acid, valeric acid, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid concentrations were proportionately higher while the anti-proliferative SCFA, butyric acid was significantly lower.
Figure 4
Figure 4. OPLS-DA scores plot generated from global GC-MS profiles differentiate stool metabolites from CRC patients and healthy adults.
Figure 5
Figure 5. A heat map showing Pearson’s correlations between groups of metabolites and bacterial genera/species that significantly differed between CRC patients and healthy adults.
Green boxes indicate positive associations and red boxes indicate negative associations.

References

    1. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, et al. (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444: 1027–1131. - PubMed
    1. Neish AS (2009) Microbes in Gastrointestinal Health and Disease. Gastroenterology 136: 65–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly D, Conway S, Aminov R (2005) Commensal gut bacteria: mechanisms of immune modulation. Trends in Immunology 26: 326–333. - PubMed
    1. Selgrad M, Malfertheiner P, Fini L, Goel A, Boland CR, et al. (2008) The role of viral and bacterial pathogens in gastrointestinal cancer. Journal of Cellular Physiology 216: 378–388. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klein RS, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, Casey JI, Steigbigel NH, et al. (1979) Streptococcus bovis septicemia and carcinoma of the colon. Ann Intern Med 91: 560–562. - PubMed

Publication types