Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e71116.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071116. Print 2013.

Month 2 culture status and treatment duration as predictors of tuberculosis relapse risk in a meta-regression model

Affiliations
Review

Month 2 culture status and treatment duration as predictors of tuberculosis relapse risk in a meta-regression model

Robert S Wallis et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: New drugs and regimens with the potential to transform tuberculosis treatment are presently in early stage clinical trials.

Objective: The goal of the present study was to infer the required duration of these treatments.

Method: A meta-regression model was developed to predict relapse risk using treatment duration and month 2 sputum culture positive rate as predictors, based on published historical data from 24 studies describing 58 regimens in 7793 patients. Regimens in which rifampin was administered for the first 2 months but not subsequently were excluded. The model treated study as a random effect.

Results: The model predicted that new regimens of 4 or 5 months duration with rates of culture positivity after 2 months of 1% or 3%, would yield relapse rates of 4.0% or 4.1%, respectively. In both cases, the upper limit of the 2-sided 80% prediction interval for relapse for a hypothetical trial with 680 subjects per arm was <10%. Analysis using this model of published month 2 data for moxifloxacin-containing regimens indicated they would result in relapse rates similar to standard therapy only if administered for ≥5 months.

Conclusions: This model is proposed to inform the required duration of treatment of new TB regimens, potentially hastening their accelerated approval by several years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: All authors are Pfizer employees and shareholders. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two views of the interrelationship of relapse, duration, and month 2 culture status, as predicted by meta-regression analysis.
Left: Relapse vs. month 2 culture positivity for regimens of 4, 5, and 6 months duration. Right: Relapse vs. duration for regimens with month 2 positive rates of 1 to 17%.

References

    1. Wallis RS (2013) Sustainable tuberculosis drug development. Clin Infect Dis 56: 106–113. - PubMed
    1. Wallis RS, Wang C, Doherty TM, Onyebujoh P, Vahedi M, et al. (2010) Biomarkers for tuberculosis disease activity, cure, and relapse. Lancet Infect Dis 10: 68–69. - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox W, Ellard GA, Mitchison DA (1999) Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 3: S231–S279. - PubMed
    1. Hong Kong Chest Service-British Medical Research Council (1978) Controlled trial of 6-month and 8-month regimens in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. First report. Am Rev Respir Dis 118: 219–228. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources