The use of diverting colostomies in paediatric peri-anal burns: experience in 45 patients
- PMID: 23941755
- DOI: 10.7196/sajs.1398
The use of diverting colostomies in paediatric peri-anal burns: experience in 45 patients
Abstract
Background: Peri-anal burns are common in children. Continual exposure to enteric organisms may lead to a contaminated burn wound, invasive sepsis, graft loss, scar contracture, anal and urinary malfunction, and delayed discharge from hospital. Use of a temporary diverting colostomy has been advocated to reduce complications.
Objectives: To review the incidence, indications, methods, bacteriology, therapeutic effects and outcomes of colostomy for perianal burns.
Methods: A prospective study of children with peri-anal burns and stomas over a 17-year period. Prophylactic or therapeutic faecal diversion was achieved by temporary, divided sigmoid end-colostomy with Hartmann's closure of the distal end.
Results: Between 1995 and 2012, 45 children with peri-anal burns received a colostomy. The mean total body surface area burned was 35% (range 3 - 80%). There were 28 flame burns, 16 fluid burns and 1 contact burn. Prophylactic colostomies were performed in 29 children, on average on day 6 after admission, and therapeutic colostomies to counteract deep wound infection and septicaemia in 16 patients, on average on day 24. In all but 2 cases there was a marked improvement in clinical appearance, graft take and healing. The bacterial profile changed from gut-derived organisms to Pseudomonas aeruginosa or no pathogens. Complications occurred in 5 patients (11.1%). Three stomas required manual reduction. Two children died of established septic shock, compounded by stomal dehiscence in 1 case. Reversal of the colostomy was performed on average at 4 months.
Conclusion: Diverting colostomy has therapeutic advantages in a select group of paediatric burns patients in whom continual faecal soiling poses a threat to both graft and life.
Similar articles
-
The use of diverting colostomies in paediatric peri-anal burns.Burns. 1999 Nov;25(7):645-50. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00076-5. Burns. 1999. PMID: 10563692
-
A non-surgical device for faecal diversion in the management of perineal burns.Burns. 2008 Sep;34(6):840-4. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.11.009. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Burns. 2008. PMID: 18395989
-
Colostomy in anorectal malformations: a procedure with serious but preventable complications.J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):748-56; discussion 748-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.021. J Pediatr Surg. 2006. PMID: 16567188
-
Perineal burn care: French working group recommendations.Burns. 2014 Jun;40(4):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 6. Burns. 2014. PMID: 24103787
-
[Perineal injuries in wartime].Ann Urol (Paris). 1997;31(5):303-8. Ann Urol (Paris). 1997. PMID: 9480637 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Study to Determine the Effect of Diaper-Based Wound Care Method in Reducing Wound Contamination Period in Patients Suffering from Perianal Burn Wound.Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Jul 12;56(4):378-381. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770787. eCollection 2023 Aug. Indian J Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 37705813 Free PMC article.
-
A Rare Case of Anal and Perianal Chemical Burn in a Child due to Potassium Permanganate Crystals.Drug Saf Case Rep. 2018 Feb 9;5(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40800-018-0072-5. Drug Saf Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 29427056 Free PMC article.
-
Unusual causes of perineal trauma in paediatric patients: lessons learned from a high-volume colorectal clinic in a low-and-middle-income country.Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 18;41(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06075-x. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025. PMID: 40533567 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical