Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;9(4):e129-35.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000800. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

Oncologists' strategies and barriers to effective communication about the end of life

Affiliations

Oncologists' strategies and barriers to effective communication about the end of life

Leeat Granek et al. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Communicating about the end of life with patients has been reported as one of the most difficult and stressful part of the work of oncologists. Despite this fact, oncologists receive little training in this area, and many do not communicate effectively with patients. The purpose of this analysis, part of a larger study examining oncologists' experiences of patient loss, was to explore oncologists' communication strategies and communication barriers when discussing end-of-life issues with patients.

Methods: Twenty oncologists were interviewed at three hospitals about their communication strategies on end-of-life issues with patients. The data were analyzed using the grounded theory method.

Results: The findings revealed the strategies to effective communication about the end of life included: being open and honest; having ongoing, early conversations; communicating about modifying treatment goals; and balancing hope and reality. Barriers to implementing these strategies fell broadly into three domains, including physician factors, patient factors, and institutional factors. Physician factors included difficulty with treatment and palliation, personal discomfort with death and dying, diffusion of responsibility among colleagues, using the "death-defying mode," lack of experience, and lack of mentorship. Patient factors included, patients and/or families being reluctant to talk about the end of life, language barriers, and younger age. Institutional factors included stigma around palliative care, lack of protocol about end-of-life issues; and lack of training for oncologists on how to talk with patients about end-of-life issues.

Conclusion: We conclude by drawing implications from our study and suggest that further research and intervention are necessary to aid oncologists in achieving effective communication about end-of-life issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA, et al. Oncologists' attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: An exploratory study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2189–2196. - PubMed
    1. Eid A, Petty M, Hutchins L, et al. “Breaking bad news”: Standardized patient intervention improves communication skills for hematology-oncology fellows and advanced practice nurses. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24:154–159. - PubMed
    1. Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, et al. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transition to palliative care. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:453–460. - PubMed
    1. Wiener JS, Cole SA. Three principles to improve clinician communication for advance care planning: Overcoming emotional, cognitive, and skill barriers. J Palliat Med. 2004;7:817–829. - PubMed
    1. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, et al. Communicating with realism and hope: Incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1278–1288. - PubMed

Publication types