Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;28(4):777-83.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8.

Making it work: health care provider perspectives on strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers

Affiliations

Making it work: health care provider perspectives on strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers

Clement K Gwede et al. J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates are low among men and women who seek health care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). This study explores health care providers' perspectives about their patient's motivators and impediments to CRCS and receptivity to preparatory education. A mixed methods design consisting of in-depth interviews, focus groups, and a short survey is used in this study. The participants of this study are 17 health care providers practicing in FQHCs in the Tampa Bay area. Test-specific patient impediments and motivations were identified including fear of abnormal findings, importance of offering less invasive fecal occult blood tests, and need for patient-centered test-specific educational materials in clinics. Opportunities to improve provider practices were identified including providers' reliance on patients' report of symptoms as a cue to recommend CRCS and overemphasis of clinic-based guaiac stool tests. This study adds to the literature on CRCS test-specific motivators and impediments. Providers offered unique approaches for motivating patients to follow through with recommended CRCS and were receptive to in-clinic patient education. Findings readily inform the design of educational materials and interventions to increase CRCS in FQHCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: 2011.
    1. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;149(9):627–37. - PubMed
    1. Lasser KE, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tarasenko YN, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors. Journal of Cancer Education. 2011;26(2):285–93. - PubMed
    1. Zapka JM, et al. Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2011;20(3):509–21. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources