Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;15(12):2022-8.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt091. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

Reactions to framing of cessation messages: insights from dual-smoker couples

Affiliations

Reactions to framing of cessation messages: insights from dual-smoker couples

Isaac M Lipkus et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Couples in which both members smoke (dual-smoker couples) have not been the explicit target of cessation interventions. Quit rates are lower and relapse rates are higher among individuals in dual-smoker couples. A potentially effective strategy to motivate dual-smoker couples to quit is to convey messages that highlight how the positive outcomes of quitting (gain frame) or the negative outcomes of continued smoking (loss frame) affect the couple rather than the individual smoker. We explored whether dual-smoker couples' smoking behaviors (e.g., amount smoked) and desire to quit would differ as a function of message frame (gain vs. loss) or outcome focus (individual vs. couple).

Methods: Dual-smoker couples (N = 40) completed a baseline survey and were then randomized to review gain- or loss-framed messages that varied whether the outcomes influenced the individual or the couple. Main outcomes were desire to quit after reading messages and smoking behaviors at a 1-month follow-up.

Results: Couple-focused messages produced the strongest desire to quit and decreased amount of cigarettes smoked at follow-up. The latter effect was mediated by desire to quit. Loss-framed messages produced inconsistent effects on desire to quit. There were no significant interactions between outcome focus and message framing.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that messages emphasizing how smoking affects both partners can motivate cessation among dual-smoker couples. Contrary to findings showing that gain-framed messages motivate cessation targeting individual smokers, results suggest that loss-framed messages may be more persuasive than gain-framed messages when the target of the outcome involves significant others.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abhyankar P., O’Connor D. B., Lawton R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 1–16.10.1080/13548500701235732 - PubMed
    1. Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
    1. Carpenter M. J., Hughes J. R., Solomon L. J., Callas P. W. (2004). Both smoking reduction with nicotine replacement therapy and motivational advice increase future cessation among smokers unmotivated to quit. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 371–381.10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.371 - PubMed
    1. Doherty W. J., Whitehead D. A. (1986). The social dynamics of cigarette smoking: A family systems perspective. Family Process, 25, 453–459.10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00453.x - PubMed
    1. Ferguson J., Bauld L., Chesterman J., Judge K. (2005). The English smoking treatment services: One-year outcomes. Addiction, 100(Suppl. 2), 59–69.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01028.x - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms