Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective
- PMID: 23949043
- DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130922
Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Many survivors of stroke remain with residual disabilities, even years later. Advances in technology have led to the development of a variety of robotic devices for use in rehabilitation. The integration of robotics in the delivery of neurorehabilitation is promising, but still not widely used in clinical settings.
Objectives: The aim of this review is to discuss the general design of three typical upper limb robotic devices, and examine the practical considerations for their use in a clinical environment.
Methods: Each device is described, the available clinical literature is reviewed and a clinical perspective is given on the usefulness of these robotic devices in rehabilitation of this population.
Results: Current literature supports the use of robotics in the clinical environment. However, claims that robotic therapy is more effective than traditional treatment is not substantially supported. The majority of clinical trials reported are small, and lack the use of a control group for comparison treatment.
Conclusions: The use of robotics in stroke rehabilitation is still a relatively new treatment platform, and still evolving. As technological advances are made, there is much potential for growth in this field.
Similar articles
-
The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014 Mar;11(2):187-98. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.882766. Epub 2014 Jan 30. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014. PMID: 24479445 Review.
-
Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy.J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(12):981-5. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0404. J Rehabil Med. 2009. PMID: 19841828
-
Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.Funct Neurol. 2009 Oct-Dec;24(4):203-6. Funct Neurol. 2009. PMID: 20412726 Review.
-
Robotic assistance for upper extremity training after stroke.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;145:25-39. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009. PMID: 19592784
-
Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513073. Epub 2013 Dec 6. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014. PMID: 24316679 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Robotics in shoulder rehabilitation.Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014 Jul 14;4(2):207-13. eCollection 2014 Apr. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014. PMID: 25332937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lost in Translation: Simple Steps in Experimental Design of Neurorehabilitation-Based Research Interventions to Promote Motor Recovery Post-Stroke.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 20;15:644335. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.644335. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33958994 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Short-Term Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation in Patients With Hand Paralysis After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Hand (N Y). 2018 Jan;13(1):95-102. doi: 10.1177/1558944717692096. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Hand (N Y). 2018. PMID: 28719996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Neural manual vs. robotic assisted mobilization to improve motion and reduce pain hypersensitivity in hand osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 May;29(5):801-806. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.801. Epub 2017 May 16. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017. PMID: 28603349 Free PMC article.
-
Brain state-dependent robotic reaching movement with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton: combining brain-machine interfacing and robotic rehabilitation.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 16;9:564. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00564. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26528168 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials