Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;101(3):197-204.
doi: 10.5935/abc.20130163. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Prospective validation of the Dante Pazzanese risk score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

[Article in English, Portuguese]

Prospective validation of the Dante Pazzanese risk score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Elizabete Silva Dos Santos et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Background: In non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the likelihood of adverse events should be estimated. Guidelines recommend risk stratification models for that purpose. The Dante Pazzanese risk score (DANTE score) is a simple risk stratification model composed with the following variables: age increase (0 to 9 points); history of diabetes mellitus (2 points) or stroke (4 points); no use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (1 point); creatinine elevation (0 to 10 points); combination of troponin elevation and ST-segment depression (0 to 4 points).

Objective: To validate the DANTE score in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

Methods: Prospective, observational study including 457 patients, from September 2009 to October 2010. The patients were grouped in risk categories according to the original model score as follows: very low; low; intermediate; and high. The predictive ability of the score was assessed by using C-statistics.

Results: The sample comprised 291 (63.7%) men, the mean age being 62.1 years (SD=11.04). The event death or (re)infarction in 30 days was observed in 17 patients (3.7%). Progressive increase in the proportion of events was observed as the score increased: very low risk = 0.0%; low risk = 3.9%; intermediate risk = 10.9%; high risk = 60.0%; p < 0.0001. C-statistics was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.94; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: DANTE score showed an excellent capacity to predict the specific events, and can be incorporated to the prognostic assessment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DANTE risk score for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. ACEI: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; EKG: electrocardiogram.
Chart 1
Chart 1
DANTE score event: death or (re)infarction in 30 days; risk categories of the DANTE score: very low = 0 to 5 points; low = 6 to 10 points; intermediate = 11 to 15 points; high = 16 to 30 points.
Chart 2
Chart 2
Mean and median of the DANTE score of patients with and without the event death or (re)infarction in up to 30 days. Patients without the event of the DANTE score: mean: 6.2 (SD=2.9), median: 6.0 (25th percentile = 4.0; 75th percentile = 8.0); patients with the event of the DANTE score: mean: 11.5 (SD=3.4), median: 10.0 (25th percentile = 9.0; 75th percentile = 15.0); p < 0.0001.
Chart 3
Chart 3
Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the occurrence of the event death or (re)infarction in 30 days, using the DANTE score. C-statistics, 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.94, p < 0.0001.

Similar articles

References

    1. Laurenti R, Buchalla CM, Caratin Vde S. Doença isquêmica do coração: internações, tempo de permanência e gastos. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2000;74(6):483–487. - PubMed
    1. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making . JAMA. 2000;284(7):835–842. - PubMed
    1. Farhi JI, Cohen M, Fuster V. The broad spectrum of unstable angina pectoris and its implications for future controlled trials. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58(6):547–550. - PubMed
    1. Braunwald E, Mark DB, Jones RH, Brown J, Brown L, Cheitlin MD, Concannon CA, Cowan M, Edwards C, Fuster V. nstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 10. Rockville. Md : Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
    1. Calvin JE, Klein LW, VandenBerg BJ, Meyer P, Condon JV, Snell RJ, et al. Risk stratification in unstable angina: prospective validation of the Braunwald classification. JAMA. 1995;273(2):136–141. - PubMed

Publication types