Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Nov;24(11):1889-900.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012100987. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Randomized, controlled trial of glucose-sparing peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, controlled trial of glucose-sparing peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients

Philip K T Li et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Glucose-containing peritoneal dialysis solutions may exacerbate metabolic abnormalities and increase cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. Here, we examined whether a low-glucose regimen improves metabolic control in diabetic patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to the control group (dextrose solutions only) or to the low-glucose intervention group (IMPENDIA trial: combination of dextrose-based solution, icodextrin and amino acids; EDEN trial: a different dextrose-based solution, icodextrin and amino acids) and followed for 6 months. Combining both studies, 251 patients were allocated to control (n=127) or intervention (n=124) across 11 countries. The primary endpoint was change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline. Mean glycated hemoglobin at baseline was similar in both groups. In the intention-to-treat population, the mean glycated hemoglobin profile improved in the intervention group but remained unchanged in the control group (0.5% difference between groups; 95% confidence interval, 0.1% to 0.8%; P=0.006). Serum triglyceride, very-low-density lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein B levels also improved in the intervention group. Deaths and serious adverse events, including several related to extracellular fluid volume expansion, increased in the intervention group, however. These data suggest that a low-glucose dialysis regimen improves metabolic indices in diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis but may be associated with an increased risk of extracellular fluid volume expansion. Thus, use of glucose-sparing regimens in peritoneal dialysis patients should be accompanied by close monitoring of fluid volume status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Enrollment, randomization, and follow-up of study participants. D-E-N, Dianeal, Extraneal and Nutrineal; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; P-E-N, Physioneal, Extraneal, Nutrineal.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean hemoglobin A1c (±SEM) at baseline, month 3, and end of study by treatment group in the intention-to-treat population. HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Comment in

References

    1. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bargman J, Vonesh E: Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 171: 110–118, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Li PK, Szeto CC: Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 1475–1478, 2008 - PubMed
    1. Boateng EA, East L: The impact of dialysis modality on quality of life: A systematic review. J Ren Care 37: 190–200, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Zhang AH, Cheng LT, Zhu N, Sun LH, Wang T: Comparison of quality of life and causes of hospitalization between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5: 49, 2007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts MA, Polkinghorne KR, McDonald SP, Ierino FL: Secular trends in cardiovascular mortality rates of patients receiving dialysis compared with the general population. Am J Kidney Dis 58: 64–72, 2011 - PubMed

Publication types