Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 9:4:521.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00521. eCollection 2013.

The impact of emotion on numerosity estimation

Affiliations

The impact of emotion on numerosity estimation

Joseph M Baker et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Both time and numerosity can be represented continuously as analog properties whose discrimination conforms to Weber's Law, suggesting that the two properties may be represented similarly. Recent research suggests that the representation of time is influenced by the presence of emotional stimuli. If time and numerosity share a common cognitive representation, it follows that a similar relationship may exist between emotional stimuli and the representation of numerosity. Here, we provide evidence that emotional stimuli significantly affect humans' estimation of visual numerosity. During a numerical bisection task, enumeration of emotional stimuli (angry faces) was more accurate compared to enumeration of neutrally valenced stimuli (neutral faces), demonstrating that emotional stimuli affect humans' visual representation of numerosity as previously demonstrated for time. These results inform and broaden our understanding of the effect of negative emotional stimuli on psychophysical discriminations of quantity.

Keywords: Weber’s Law; emotion; numerical cognition; quantitative discrimination; quantity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Example of a trial within the numerical bisection training task. A participant begins a trial by fixating on a cross. The participant is then shown a stimulus screen, displaying a number of stimuli to rapidly enumerate. The participant is then shown a choice screen, and must decide whether the stimulus numerosity was closer in numerical quantity to the small anchor quantity or the large anchor quantity.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Point of subjective equality and standard error values for each valence.

References

    1. Allman M. J., Pelphrey K. A., Meck W. H. (2012). Developmental neuroscience of time and number: implications for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:7 10.3389/fnint.2012.00007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angrilli A., Cherubini P., Pavese A., Manfredini S. (1997). The influence of affective factors on time perception. Percept. Psychophys. 59 972–982 10.3758/BF03205512 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bahrick L. E., Lickliter R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Dev. Psychol. 36 190–201 10.1037//0012-1649.36.2.190 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker J. M., Morath J., Rodzon K. R., Jordan K. E. (2012). A shared system of representation governing quantity discrimination in canids. Front. Psychol. 3:387 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00387 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker J. M., Shivik J., Jordan K. E. (2011). Tracking of food quantity by coyotes (Canis latrans). Behav. Processes 88 72–75 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.006 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources