Bilateral descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis in rats
- PMID: 23951340
- PMCID: PMC3737186
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073022
Bilateral descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis in rats
Erratum in
-
Correction: Bilateral Descending Hypothalamic Projections to the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis in Rats.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 27;8(9):10.1371/annotation/7c794f90-1101-4196-8b10-4e3e320a7aac. doi: 10.1371/annotation/7c794f90-1101-4196-8b10-4e3e320a7aac. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24116251 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Several lines of evidence suggest that the hypothalamus is involved in trigeminal pain processing. However, the organization of descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) remains poorly understood. Microinjections of the retrograde tracer, fluorogold (FG), into the Sp5C, in rats, reveal that five hypothalamic nuclei project to the Sp5C: the paraventricular nucleus, the lateral hypothalamic area, the perifornical hypothalamic area, the A11 nucleus and the retrochiasmatic area. Descending hypothalamic projections to the Sp5C are bilateral, except those from the paraventricular nucleus which exhibit a clear ipsilateral predominance. Moreover, the density of retrogradely FG-labeled neurons in the hypothalamus varies according to the dorso-ventral localization of the Sp5C injection site. There are much more labeled neurons after injections into the ventrolateral part of the Sp5C (where ophthalmic afferents project) than after injections into its dorsomedial or intermediate parts (where mandibular and maxillary afferents, respectively, project). These results demonstrate that the organization of descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal dorsal horn and Sp5C are different. Whereas the former are ipsilateral, the latter are bilateral. Moreover, hypothalamic projections to the Sp5C display somatotopy, suggesting that these projections are preferentially involved in the processing of meningeal and cutaneous inputs from the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve in rats. Therefore, our results suggest that the control of trigeminal and spinal dorsal horn processing of nociceptive information by hypothalamic neurons is different and raise the question of the role of bilateral, rather than unilateral, hypothalamic control.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Millan MJ (2002) Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol 66: 355-474. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00009-6. PubMed: 12034378. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Saper CB (2012) Hypothalamus. The Human Nervous System. Elsevier; pp. 549-572.
-
- Holle D, Katsarava Z, Obermann M (2011) The hypothalamus: specific or nonspecific role in the pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias? Curr Pain Headache Rep 15: 101-107. doi:10.1007/s11916-010-0166-y. PubMed: 21128020. - DOI - PubMed
-
- May A, Bahra A, Büchel C, Frackowiak RS, Goadsby PJ (1998) Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks. Lancet 352: 275-278. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02470-2. PubMed: 9690407. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
