Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
- PMID: 23953384
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61450-6
Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2013 Sep 14;382(9896):940
Abstract
Background: Remote ischaemic preconditioning has been associated with reduced risk of myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We investigated the safety and efficacy of this procedure.
Methods: Eligible patients were those scheduled to undergo elective isolated first-time CABG surgery under cold crystalloid cardioplegia and cardiopulmonary bypass at the West-German Heart Centre, Essen, Germany, between April, 2008, and October, 2012. Patients were prospectively randomised to receive remote ischaemic preconditioning (three cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion in the left upper arm after induction of anaesthesia) or no ischaemic preconditioning (control). The primary endpoint was myocardial injury, as reflected by the geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) for perioperative concentrations of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in serum in the first 72 h after CABG. Mortality was the main safety endpoint. Analysis was done in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01406678.
Findings: 329 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data did not differ between groups. cTnI AUC was 266 ng/mL over 72 h (95% CI 237-298) in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group and 321 ng/mL (287-360) in the control group. In the intention-to-treat population, the ratio of remote ischaemic preconditioning to control for cTnI AUC was 0·83 (95% CI 0·70-0·97, p=0·022). cTnI release remained lower in the per-protocol analysis (0·79, 0·66-0·94, p=0·001). All-cause mortality was assessed over 1·54 (SD 1·22) years and was lower with remote ischaemic preconditioning than without (ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·08-0·98, p=0·046).
Interpretation: Remote ischaemic preconditioning provided perioperative myocardial protection and improved the prognosis of patients undergoing elective CABG surgery.
Funding: German Research Foundation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Remote preconditioning and all-cause mortality.Lancet. 2013 Aug 17;382(9892):579-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61607-4. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23953375 No abstract available.
-
Surgery: Remote ischaemic conditioning--approaching prime time?Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Nov;10(11):619-21. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.154. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24060957 No abstract available.
-
Remote ischemic preconditioning: no loss in clinical translation.Circ Res. 2013 Dec 6;113(12):1278-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.302942. Circ Res. 2013. PMID: 24311614 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
