Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Nov;26(11):1258-1266.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Reproducibility of speckle-tracking-based strain measures of left ventricular function in a community-based study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Reproducibility of speckle-tracking-based strain measures of left ventricular function in a community-based study

Susan Cheng et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements of myocardial strain, performed in a community-based setting, has not been reported previously.

Methods: The reproducibility of left ventricular strain measurements was examined in two samples of 20 participants each from the Offspring Cohort of the Framingham Heart Study (mean age, 63 ± 9 years; 59% women). Two-dimensional speckle-tracking-based measurements of global peak left ventricular strain in systole were performed in the apical four-chamber, apical two-chamber, and midventricular parasternal short-axis views.

Results: Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.84 for all global strain measurements, with average coefficients of variation of ≤4% for global longitudinal and circumferential strain and <8% for global transverse and radial strain. For left ventricular strain measurements performed in each of the three views, intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.91 among time points spanning a total 8-month period. The average coefficients of variation were <6% for global longitudinal and circumferential strain and <9% for global transverse and radial strain. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility findings were similar in analyses adjusting for frame rate.

Conclusions: Excellent reproducibility of global longitudinal and circumferential strain measurements and very good reproducibility of global transverse and radial strain measurements were observed. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the reproducibility of performing echocardiographic strain measurements in a large, epidemiologic community-based setting.

Keywords: A2C; A4C; Apical four-chamber; Apical two-chamber; Epidemiology; ICC; Intraclass correlation coefficient; LV; Left ventricular; Myocardial deformation; SAX; Short-axis; Speckle-tracking; Strain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest/Disclosures

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative examples of global left ventricular strain measures obtained from each of the 3 main views: Panel A shows longitudinal and radial strain measured from the A2C view; Panel B shows longitudinal and radial strain measured from the A4C view; and, Panel C shows circumferential and radian strain measured from the SAX view. Colored lines represent strain curves for each of the 6 regional segments over time; black lines represent the global average of strain across the 6 regional segments over time (for each view).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing of baseline and follow-up reproducibility analyses performed. See text for description.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland-Altman plots are shown for inter-observer variability at baseline for measurements made in each of the 3 main views (Panels A through F). The difference between 2 measurements made (per image) is plotted versus the mean value of the 2 measurements made by: Reader 1 compared to Reader 2 (red circles), Reader 1 compared to Reader 3 (blue triangles), and Reader 2 compared to Reader 3 (green cross bars). All values shown are in % units of strain.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bland-Altman plots are shown for intra-observer variability, over the course of the measurement period, for measurements made in each of the 3 main views (Panels A through F). The difference between 2 measurements made (per image) is plotted versus the mean value of the 2 measurements made at: Time Point 1 compared to Time Point 2 (red circles), Time Point 1 compared to Time Point 3 (blue triangles), and Time Point 2 compared to Time Point 3 (green cross bars). All values shown are in % units of strain.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean (±standard deviation) of measurement values, over the course of the measurement period, are shown for each of the 3 readers: A2C measures of global longitudinal (squares) and transverse (circles) strain for Reader 2 (Panel A), A4C measures of global longitudinal (squares) and transverse (circles) strain for Reader 1 (Panel B), and SAX measures of global circumferential (squares) and0 radial (circles) strain for Reader 3 (Panel C).

References

    1. Shah AM, Solomon SD. Myocardial deformation imaging: current status and future directions. Circulation. 2012;125:e244–e248. - PubMed
    1. Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:789–793. - PubMed
    1. Langeland S, D’Hooge J, Wouters PF, Leather HA, Claus P, Bijnens B, et al. Experimental validation of a new ultrasound method for the simultaneous assessment of radial and longitudinal myocardial deformation independent of insonation angle. Circulation. 2005;112:2157–2162. - PubMed
    1. Korinek J, Wang J, Sengupta PP, Miyazaki C, Kjaergaard J, McMahon E, et al. Two-dimensional strain--a Doppler-independent ultrasound method for quantitation of regional deformation: validation in vitro and in vivo. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1247–1253. - PubMed
    1. Stanton T, Leano R, Marwick TH. Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:356–364. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms