Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox
- PMID: 23953996
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006
Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox
Comment in
-
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis is broadly defined, substantive issues are key: a reply to Sheil and Burslem.Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;28(10):572-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 20. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013. PMID: 23968969 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned.Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;28(2):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013. PMID: 22981468
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
