Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct;39(10):1528-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.040. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Comparison of the actual amount of axial movement of 3 aspheric intraocular lenses using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the actual amount of axial movement of 3 aspheric intraocular lenses using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Youngsub Eom et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the mean effective lens position (ELP) and actual amount of axial movement of 3 aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Methods: Consecutive patients had phacoemulsification with aspheric IOL implantation. The ELP measurements by AS-OCT were taken 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The ELPRMS was defined as the root mean square (RMS) of the change in ELP at each follow-up timepoint.

Results: An XL Stabi ZO 3-plate IOL was implanted in 30 eyes, an Acrysof IQ C-loop IOL in 22 eyes, and an Akreos MI-60 4-plate IOL in 17 eyes. The 4-plate IOL showed significant changes in the mean ELP from 1 week to 1 month and from 3 to 6 months postoperatively (P=.005 and P=.028, respectively). The changes of the other 2 IOLs were insignificant during the 3 postoperative visits. However, the mean ELPRMS of the C-loop IOL (0.06 mm ± 0.31 [SD]) was smaller than that of the 3-plate IOL (0.14 ± 0.28 mm) and the 4-plate IOL (0.20 ± 0.35 mm) (P=.014 and P=.023, respectively) during the 3 timepoints.

Conclusion: An appropriate method based on the actual amount of axial IOL movement, such as the ELPRMS, is needed to assess the axial positional stability of IOLs.

Financial disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources