Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;31(10):677-84.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-013-0235-3. Epub 2013 Aug 18.

Computer-assisted solid lung nodule 3D volumetry on CT: influence of scan mode and iterative reconstruction: a CT phantom study

Affiliations

Computer-assisted solid lung nodule 3D volumetry on CT: influence of scan mode and iterative reconstruction: a CT phantom study

Adriaan Coenen et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of high-resolution scan mode and iterative reconstruction on lung nodule 3D volumetry.

Methods: Solid nodules with various sizes (5, 8, 10 and 12 mm) were placed inside a chest phantom. CT images were obtained with various tube currents, scan modes (conventional mode, high-resolution mode) and iterative reconstructions [0, 50 and 100 % blending of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) and filtered back projection]. The nodule volumes were calculated using semiautomatic software and compared with the assumed volume from the nodules.

Results: The mean absolute and relative percentage error improved when using iterative reconstruction especially when using the conventional scan mode; however, this effect was not significant. Significant reduction in volume overestimation was observed when using high-resolution scan mode (P = 0.011).

Conclusion: The high-resolution mode significantly reduces the volume overestimation of 3D volumetry. Iterative reconstruction shows a reduction in volume overestimation and error margin especially with the conventional scan mode; however, this effect was not significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4185-95 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2013 Apr;48(4):206-12 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1577-83 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):944-54 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources