Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;57(11):1550-9.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cit521. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma as an adjunct diagnostic for gastrointestinal tract disease in kidney and liver transplant recipients

Affiliations

Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma as an adjunct diagnostic for gastrointestinal tract disease in kidney and liver transplant recipients

Christine M Durand et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is the most common infectious complication after solid organ transplantation, frequently affecting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. There are limited data on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for plasma CMV DNA as an adjunct diagnostic method for GI tract disease in kidney and liver transplant recipients.

Methods: We reviewed all records of adult kidney and liver transplant recipients with a GI tract biopsy and plasma CMV qPCR result within 15 days of biopsy during a 6.5-year period at our center. CMV GI tract disease was defined as histopathologic evidence of CMV on biopsy by immunohistochemistry or visualization of inclusion bodies.

Results: GI tract biopsy and qPCR results were available for 81 kidney and liver transplant recipients; 20 cases of confirmed CMV GI tract disease were identified. Overall, the sensitivity of qPCR for diagnosing CMV GI tract disease was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-96%), and the specificity was 95% (95% CI, 85%-99%). For CMV-seronegative recipients (R(-)) with CMV-seropositive donors (D(+)), the sensitivity of qPCR was 100% (95% CI, 59%-99%), and the specificity was 80% (95% CI, 30%-99%). The lowest sensitivity was observed in CMV D(+)/R(+) cases (72.7%; 95% CI, 39%-93%). The mean plasma CMV copy number in patients with GI tract disease was 3.84 log10 (38 334 copies/mL).

Conclusions: Plasma CMV qPCR had good sensitivity and excellent specificity for CMV GI tract disease in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Its sensitivity was 100% in CMV D(+)/R(-) cases but 72.7% in CMV D(+)/R(+) cases. This variation in assay performance according to host serostatus may reflect differences in disease pathogenesis.

Keywords: CMV; colitis; kidney and liver transplant recipients; viremia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timing of cytomegalovirus (CMV) gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease diagnosis in transplant recipients relative to transplantation. Abbreviations: D+, donor CMV seropositive; D, donor seronegative; R+, recipient seropositive; R, recipient seronegative.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) plasma viral load (DNA) for each patient with suspected CMV gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease, measured within 15 days of GI tract biopsy. Solid circles represent patients with detectable CMV DNA; open circles, patients with undetectable CMV DNA, at the lower limit of detection of the assay in use at the time. Three quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays were used during the study period, with varying lower limits of detection (600, 300, and 50 copies/mL) represented by dotted lines.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Positive (A) and negative (B) predictive values calculated from the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of plasma cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction over a range of hypothetical prevalence values. Dotted lines represent prevalence of CMV gastrointestinal tract disease among patients in this series in whom biopsy was performed (24.7%), in whom the positive and negative predictive values were 0.85 and 0.94, respectively.

Comment in

References

    1. Humar A, Snydman D AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(Suppl 4):S78–86. - PubMed
    1. Limaye AP, Bakthavatsalam R, Kim HW, et al. Impact of cytomegalovirus in organ transplant recipients in the era of antiviral prophylaxis. Transplantation. 2006;81:1645–52. - PubMed
    1. Arthurs SK, Eid AJ, Pedersen RA, et al. Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:1703–9. - PubMed
    1. Arthurs SK, Eid AJ, Pedersen RA, et al. Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease and the risk of allograft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:840–6. - PubMed
    1. Humar A, Michaels M AST ID Working Group on Infectious Disease Monitoring. American Society of Transplantation recommendations for screening, monitoring and reporting of infectious complications in immunosuppression trials in recipients of organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:262–74. - PubMed

Publication types