Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;54(8):499-503.
doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.499. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on prognosis of nonmetastatic renal cell cancer

Affiliations

Effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on prognosis of nonmetastatic renal cell cancer

Evren Süer et al. Korean J Urol. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic value of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients treated surgically for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Materials and methods: Between 1995 and 2011, 588 patients with renal tumor diagnoses were treated surgically and 492 patients with pathologically confirmed nonmetastatic RCC diagnoses were included in the study. The associations of clinical and pathologic parameters with a type 2 DM diagnosis were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier estimations for disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were generated according to type 2 DM diagnosis, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival according to the variables.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.7±12 years (range, 15 to 84 years; median, 58 years) and the mean length of follow-up was 35.9±28 months (range, 1 to 145 months; median, 34.3 months). Of the 492 patients, 62 (12.6%) had a diagnosis of DM at the time of surgery (group I) and 430 did not have DM (group II). The mean age and the incidence of clear cell RCC histological subtype were significantly higher in group I than in group II (p<0.001 and p=0.036, respectively). Although DSS and OS were lower in group I, this difference was not significant. Type 2 DM was not detected as an independent prognostic factor for DSS and OS.

Conclusions: This study investigated the role and effect of DM on the prognosis of localized RCC that was treated surgically. The present study did not detect DM as an independent prognostic factor for RCC.

Keywords: Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Kaplan-Meier curve of the two groups for disease-specific survival. DM, diabetes mellitus.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Kaplan-Meier curve of the two groups for overall survival. DM, diabetes mellitus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. - PubMed
    1. European Network of Cancer Registries. Eurocim version 4.0. European incidence database V2.3, 730 entity dictionary (2001) Lyon: European Network of Cancer Registries; 2001.
    1. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1331–1334. - PubMed
    1. Lindblad P. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Surg. 2004;93:88–96. - PubMed
    1. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010;58:398–406. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources