Muscle mass predicts outcomes following liver transplantation
- PMID: 23960026
- PMCID: PMC4382961
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.23724
Muscle mass predicts outcomes following liver transplantation
Abstract
For patients with end-stage liver disease, commonly used indices of nutritional status (ie, body weight and body mass index) are often inflated because of fluid overload (ie, ascites and peripheral edema), and this results in an underdiagnosis of malnutrition. Because muscle is the largest protein reservoir in the body, an estimate of the muscle mass may be a more reliable and valid estimate of nutritional status. Therefore, we used pretransplant computed tomography data for 338 liver transplantation (LT) candidates to identify muscle and fat mass on the basis of a specific abdominal transverse section commonly used in body composition analyses, and we investigated the contribution of this measure to specific post-LT outcomes. We found that the majority of our patients (68%) could be defined as cachectic. For men, muscle mass predicted many important posttransplant outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total length of stay (LOS), and days of intubation. Muscle mass was a significant predictor of survival and also predicted disposition to home versus another facility. For women, muscle mass predicted ICU stay, total LOS, and days of intubation, but the effect was modest. Muscle mass did not predict survival or disposition for women. In conclusion, because pretransplant muscle mass is associated with many important postoperative outcomes, we discuss these findings in the context of possible pretransplant interventions for either improving or sustaining muscle mass before surgery.
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose
Figures


Comment in
-
Muscle mass and mortality in chronic liver disease: the impact of testosterone.Liver Transpl. 2014 Apr;20(4):504-5. doi: 10.1002/lt.23808. Epub 2014 Jan 27. Liver Transpl. 2014. PMID: 24357579 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 23960026.Liver Transpl. 2014 Apr;20(4):506. doi: 10.1002/lt.23842. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Liver Transpl. 2014. PMID: 24493143 No abstract available.
References
-
- Figueiredo FA, Perez RM, Freitas MM, Kondo M. Comparison of three methods of nutritional assessment in liver cirrhosis: subjective global assessment, traditional nutritional parameters, and body composition analysis. J of Gastro. 2006;41(5):476–82. - PubMed
-
- Ohkawa S, Odamaki M, Yoneyama T, et al. Standardized thigh muscle area measured by computed axial tomography as an alternate muscle mass index for nutritional assessment of hemodialysis patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):485–490. - PubMed
-
- Marquis K, Debigare R, Lacasse Y, et al. Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:809–813. - PubMed
-
- Tandon P, Ney M, Irwin I, et al. Severe Muscle Depletion in Patients on the Liver Transplant Wait List: Its Prevalence and Independent Prognostic Value. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1209–1216. - PubMed
-
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical