Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;3(2):113-7.
doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.114269.

Secondary confirmation of endotracheal tube position by diaphragm motion in right subcostal ultrasound view

Affiliations

Secondary confirmation of endotracheal tube position by diaphragm motion in right subcostal ultrasound view

Javad Seyed Hosseini et al. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of right subcostal ultrasound view to confirm correct endotracheal tube intubation (ETT).

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, apneic or paralyzed patients who had an indication of intubation were selected. Intubation and ventilation with bag were performed by the skilled third-year emergency medicine residents. The residents, following a brief training course of ultrasonography, interpreted the diaphragm motion, and identified either esophageal or tracheal intubation. The confirmation of ETT placement was done by the sonographer. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for tracheal versus esophageal intubation.

Results: A total of 57 patients aged 59 ± 5 who underwent ETT insertion were studied. Thirty-four of them were male (60%). Ultrasound correctly identified 11 out of 12 esophageal intubations for a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 62-100), but misidentified one esophageal intubation as tracheal. Sonographers correctly identified 43 out of 45 (96%) tracheal intubations for a specificity of 96% (95% CI = 85-99), but misdiagnosed two tracheal intubations as esophageal.

Conclusions: This study suggests that diaphragm motion in right subcostal ultrasound view is an effective adjunct to diagnose ETT place in patients undergoing intubation in emergency department.

Keywords: Diaphragm motion; endotracheal tube intubation; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Position of the probe on the patient's abdomen
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Diaphragm view in the right subcostal area before ventilation. (b) right side diaphragm position during the positive-pressure ventilation

References

    1. Graham CA, Brittliff J, Beard D, McKeown DW. Airway equipment in Scottish emergency departments. Eur J Emerg Med. 2003;10:16–8. - PubMed
    1. Winchell RJ, Hoyt DB. Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury. Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego. Arch Surg. 1997;132:592–7. - PubMed
    1. Grmec S. Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:701–4. - PubMed
    1. Adriani J. Unrecognized esophageal placement of endotracheal tubes. South Med J. 1986;79:1591–3. - PubMed
    1. Adriani J, Naraghi M, Ward M. Complications of endotracheal intubation. South Med J. 1988;81:739–44. - PubMed