The case for fencing remains intact
- PMID: 23962143
- DOI: 10.1111/ele.12171
The case for fencing remains intact
Abstract
Creel et al. argue against the conservation effectiveness of fencing based on a population measure that ignores the importance of top predators to ecosystem processes. Their statistical analyses consider, first, only a subset of fenced reserves and, second, an incomplete examination of 'costs per lion.' Our original conclusions remain unaltered.
Keywords: Carrying capacity; edge effects; fences; lions; population size.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
Comment on
-
Conserving large carnivores: dollars and fence.Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16(5):635-41. doi: 10.1111/ele.12091. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Ecol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23461543
-
Conserving large populations of lions - the argument for fences has holes.Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1413, e1-3. doi: 10.1111/ele.12145. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Ecol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23837659
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources