Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013;2013(46):13-35.
doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt007.

Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review

Eboneé N Butler et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and Canada. Given the high incidence and increased survival of colorectal cancer patients, prevalence is increasing over time in both countries. Using MEDLINE, we conducted a systematic review of the literature published between 2000 and 2010 to describe patterns of colorectal cancer care. Specifically we examined data sources used to obtain treatment information and compared patterns of cancer-directed initial care, post-diagnostic surveillance care, and end-of-life care among colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in the United States and Canada. Receipt of initial treatment for colorectal cancer was associated with the anatomical position of the tumor and extent of disease at diagnosis, in accordance with consensus-based guidelines. Overall, care trends were similar between the United States and Canada; however, we observed differences with respect to data sources used to measure treatment receipt. Differences were also present between study populations within country, further limiting direct comparisons. Findings from this review will allow researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to evaluate treatment receipt by patient, clinical, or system characteristics and identify emerging trends over time. Furthermore, comparisons between health-care systems in the United States and Canada can identify disparities in care, allow the evaluation of different models of care, and highlight issues regarding the utility of existing data sources to estimate national patterns of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed June 7, 2013
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012 [published online ahead of print January 13, 2012]. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.10.3322/caac.20138 - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Society’s Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics Canadian Cancer Statistics 2011. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2011
    1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates [published online ahead of print December 10, 2009]. Cancer. 2010;116(3):544–573.10.1002/cncr.24760 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U, et al. Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. [published online ahead of print January 17, 2007]. Med Care. 2007;45(2):160–167.10.1002/cncr.24760 - PubMed