Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;2013(46):36-61.
doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt009.

Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand

Affiliations

Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand

Neetu Chawla et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in women and the third most common in men worldwide. In this study, we used MEDLINE to conduct a systematic review of existing literature published in English between 2000 and 2010 on patterns of colorectal cancer care. Specifically, this review examined 66 studies conducted in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand to assess patterns of initial care, post-diagnostic surveillance, and end-of-life care for colorectal cancer. The majority of studies in this review reported rates of initial care, and limited research examined either post-diagnostic surveillance or end-of-life care for colorectal cancer. Older colorectal cancer patients and individuals with comorbidities generally received less surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to receive treatment, and variations in patterns of care were observed by patient demographic and clinical characteristics, geographical location, and hospital setting. However, there was wide variability in data collection and measures, health-care systems, patient populations, and population representativeness, making direct comparisons challenging. Future research and policy efforts should emphasize increased comparability of data systems, promote data standardization, and encourage collaboration between and within European cancer registries and administrative databases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of studies by country.

References

    1. Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide in 2008 GLOBOCAN 2008 Cancer Fact Sheet Web site. http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/cancers/colorectal.asp Accessed February 10, 2012
    1. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917 - PubMed
    1. Capocaccia R, Gatta G, Roazzi P, et al. EUROCARE Working Group. The EUROCARE-3 database: methodology of data collection, standardisation, quality control and statistical analysis. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(Suppl 5):v14–v27 - PubMed
    1. Brenner H, Bouvier AM, Foschi R, et al. EUROCARE Working Group Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: the EUROCARE study [published online ahead of print August 3, 2011]. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(7):1649–1658.10.1002/ijc.26192 - PubMed
    1. Lepage C, Ciccolallo L, De Angelis R, Bouvier AM, Faivre J, Gatta G. EUROCARE Working Group European disparities in malignant digestive endocrine tumours survival. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(12):2928–2934 - PubMed

Publication types