Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013:105:125-52.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396968-2.00005-1.

Vegetative phase change and shoot maturation in plants

Affiliations
Review

Vegetative phase change and shoot maturation in plants

R Scott Poethig. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2013.

Abstract

As a plant shoot develops, it produces different types of leaves, buds, and internodes, and eventually acquires the capacity to produce structures involved in sexual reproduction. Morphological and anatomical traits that change in coordinated fashion at a predictable time in vegetative development allow this process to be divided into several more-or-less discrete phases; the transition between these phases is termed "vegetative phase change." Vegetative phase change is regulated by a decrease in the expression of the related microRNAs, miR156, and miR157, which act by repressing the expression of squamosa promoter binding protein/SBP-like (SBP/SPL) transcription factors. SBP/SPL proteins regulate a wide variety of processes in shoot development, including flowering time and inflorescence development. Answers to long-standing questions about the relationship between vegetative and reproductive maturation have come from genetic analyses of the transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory networks in which these proteins are involved. Studies conducted over several decades indicate that carbohydrates have a significant effect on phase-specific leaf traits, and recent research suggests that sugar may be the leaf signal that promotes vegetative phase change.

Keywords: Flowering time; Heteroblasty; Heterochrony; Phase change; SBP; SPL; Shoot morphogenesis; miR156; miR172.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The abundance of miR156, miR157, and miR172 is correlated with the vegetative phase of woody species. A–E, Juvenile and adult leaves of A) Acacia confusa, B) Acacia colei, C) Eucalyptus globulus, D) Hedera helix (English ivy), and E) Quercus acutissima (sawtooth oak). The leaves shown in A and B are successive leaves on the same shoot. F) Northern blots of small RNA from the leaves shown in A–E, hybridized with probes to the indicated transcripts. Scale bars correspond to 2 cm. Modified from (Wang et al, 2011).
Figure 2
Figure 2
miR156 controls reproductive competence by repressing the expression of genes required for flower production. The pathways illustrated here are based on validated miRNA-target interactions and transcription factor binding studies described in the text. Black indicates genes that are expressed; gray represents repressed genes.

References

    1. Abedon BG, Revilla P, Tracy WF. Vegetative phase change in sweet corn populations: Genetics and relationship with agronomic traits. Maydica. 1996;41:77–82.
    1. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ. Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol. 2008;18:758–762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allsopp A. Experimental and analytical studies of Pteridophytes XVII. The effect of various physiologically active substances on the development of Marsilea in sterile culture. Ann Bot. 1952;16:165–183.
    1. Allsopp A. Experimental and analytical studies of Pteridophytes XIX. Investigations on Marsilea 2. Induced reversion to juvenile stages. Ann Bot. 1953a;17:37–55.
    1. Allsopp A. Experimental and analytical studies of Pteridophytes XXI. Investigations on Marsilea 3. The effect of various sugars on development and morphology. Ann Bot. 1953b;17:447–463.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources