Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Jan;23(1):135-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2964-5. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients

Alistair Daniel Robert Jones et al. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Study design: Prospective clinical observational study of low back pain (LBP) in patients undergoing laminectomy or laminotomy surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Objectives: To quantify any change in LBP following laminectomy or laminotomy spinal decompression surgery.

Patients and methods: 119 patients with LSS completed Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale for back and leg pain, preoperatively, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively.

Results: There was significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in mean LBP from a baseline of 5.14/10 to 3.03/10 at 6 weeks. Similar results were seen at 1 year where mean LBP score was 3.07/10. There was a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in the mean ODI at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Mean ODI fell from 44.82 to 25.13 at 6 weeks and 28.39 at 1 year.

Conclusion: The aim of surgery in patients with LSS is to improve the resulting symptoms that include radicular leg pain and claudication. This observational study reports statistically significant improvement of LBP after LSS surgery. This provides frequency distribution data, which can be used to inform prospective patients of the expected outcomes of such surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Visual Analogue Pain Score sheet

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macfarlane GJ, Beasley M, Jones EA, Prescott GJ, Docking R, Keeley P, McBeth J, Jones GT (2012) The prevalence and management of low back pain across adulthood: Results from a population-based cross-sectional study (the MUSICIAN study). Pain 153(1):27–32. Epub 2011 Oct 5 - PubMed
    1. Ganz JC. Lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative results in terms of preoperative posture-related pain. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(1):71–74. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.1.0071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spivak JM. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1998;80(7):1053–1066. - PubMed
    1. Berthelot JM, Bertrand VA, Rodet D, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. Rev Rheum Engl Ed. 1997;64:315–325. - PubMed
    1. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(2):129–141. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0129. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types