Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Aug 20;2(4):e000251.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000251.

Trials to improve blood pressure through adherence to antihypertensives in stroke/TIA: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Trials to improve blood pressure through adherence to antihypertensives in stroke/TIA: systematic review and meta-analysis

Anna De Simoni et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether interventions including components to improve adherence to antihypertensive medications in patients after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) improve adherence and blood pressure control.

Methods and results: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI, PsycINFO, and article reference lists to October 2012. Search terms included stroke/TIA, adherence/prevention, hypertension, and randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria were participants with stroke/TIA; interventions including a component to improve adherence to antihypertensive medications; and outcomes including blood pressure, antihypertensive adherence, or both. Two reviewers independently assessed studies to determine eligibility, validity, and quality. Seven RCTs were eligible (n=1591). Methodological quality varied. All trials tested multifactorial interventions. None targeted medication adherence alone. Six trials measured blood pressure and 3 adherence. Meta-analysis of 6 trials showed that multifactorial programs were associated with improved blood pressure control. The difference between intervention versus control in mean improvement in systolic blood pressure was -5.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -10.2 to -0.4 mm Hg, P=0.035; I(2)=67% [21% to 86%]) and in diastolic blood pressure was -2.5 mm Hg (-5.0 to -0.1 mm Hg, P=0.046; I(2)=47% [0% to 79%]). There was no effect on medication adherence where measured.

Conclusions: Multifactorial interventions including a component to improve medication adherence can lower blood pressure after stroke/TIA. However, it is not possible to say whether or not this is achieved through better medication adherence. Trials are needed of well-characterized interventions to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes with measurement along the hypothesized causal pathway.

Keywords: blood pressure; hypertension; prevention; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow. TIA indicates transient ischemic attack.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representation of interventions from the 7 trials included in the review. See label on top right for explanation. Sizes correlated with percentge of involvement. *Significant blood pressure improvement in the intervention group. m Indicates months; TIA, transient ischemic attack; HTN, hypertension; f/u, follow‐up; GP, general practitioner.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Meta‐analysis of effect of interventions on systolic blood pressure (A) and diastolic blood pressure (B). SD indicates standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of excluding: A, relatively small studies (with <50 participants per randomization group); B, the study considered at high risk of bias; C, studies that did not measure adherence; D, studies that did not properly describe the adherence component of the intervention. SBP indicates systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Preventing Chronic Disease: A Vital Investment. 2005Geneva: World Health Organization
    1. Arima H, Tzourio C, Butcher K, Anderson C, Bousser MG, Lees KR, Reid JL, Omae T, Woodward M, MacMahon S, Chalmers JPROGRESS Collaborative Group Prior events predict cerebrovascular and coronary outcomes in the PROGRESS trial. Stroke. 2006; 37:1497-1502 - PubMed
    1. Hankey G, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst R, Forbes S, Burvill PW, Anderson CS, Stewart‐Wynne EG. Long‐term risk of first recurrent stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 1998; 29:2491-2500 - PubMed
    1. Mant J, Wade DT, Winner S. In: Stevens A, Raftery J, Mant J, Simpson S. (eds.). Health care needs assessment: stroke. Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews, First Series. 20042nd edOxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 141-244
    1. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Stroke recurrence: predictors, severity, and prognosis. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Neurology. 1997; 48:891-895 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources