Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma
- PMID: 23964934
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy.
Methods: We randomly assigned 1110 patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily; 557 patients) or sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment; 553 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent review, and the study was powered to show the noninferiority of pazopanib versus sunitinib. Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and quality of life.
Results: Pazopanib was noninferior to sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival (hazard ratio for progression of disease or death from any cause, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.22), meeting the predefined noninferiority margin (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, <1.25). Overall survival was similar (hazard ratio for death with pazopanib, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.08). Patients treated with sunitinib, as compared with those treated with pazopanib, had a higher incidence of fatigue (63% vs. 55%), the hand-foot syndrome (50% vs. 29%), and thrombocytopenia (78% vs. 41%); patients treated with pazopanib had a higher incidence of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (60%, vs. 43% with sunitinib). The mean change from baseline in 11 of 14 health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly those related to fatigue or soreness in the mouth, throat, hands, or feet, during the first 6 months of treatment favored pazopanib (P<0.05 for all 11 comparisons).
Conclusions: Pazopanib and sunitinib have similar efficacy, but the safety and quality-of-life profiles favor pazopanib. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; COMPARZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00720941.).
Comment in
-
Kidney cancer: Comparing first-line treatments for mRCC.Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):557. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.207. Epub 2013 Sep 10. Nat Rev Urol. 2013. PMID: 24018564 No abstract available.
-
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in renal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 14;369(20):1970. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1311795. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24224635 No abstract available.
-
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in renal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 14;369(20):1968-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1311795. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24224636 No abstract available.
-
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in renal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 14;369(20):1969. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1311795. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24224637 No abstract available.
-
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in renal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 14;369(20):1969. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1311795. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24224638 No abstract available.
-
First line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: two standards with different toxicity profile.Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 Jan;15(1):19-21. doi: 10.4161/cbt.27150. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014. PMID: 24253418 Free PMC article.
-
Words of wisdom: Re: Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):667-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.023. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24484761 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom: Re: Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):1014-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.042. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24646500 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical