Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;51(11):3858-61.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01703-13. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Validation of an rpoB gene PCR assay for detection of Tropheryma whipplei: 10 years' experience in a National Reference Laboratory

Affiliations

Validation of an rpoB gene PCR assay for detection of Tropheryma whipplei: 10 years' experience in a National Reference Laboratory

Annette Moter et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

The performance of a real-time PCR assay targeting the Tropheryma whipplei rpoB gene was evaluated using test strains and 1,236 clinical specimens in a national reference laboratory. The novel rpoB-PCR assay proved to be specific, revealed improved analytical sensitivity, and substantially accelerated detection of T. whipplei DNA in clinical specimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Assessment of the sensitivity of the rpoB gene real-time PCR assay. Using serial dilutions of a suspension of T. whipplei strain Twist ATCC VR-1528 (1 to 8, corresponding to 1,740,000 to 0.174 microorganisms per 5 μl), the sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay was determined at 17.4 microorganisms per 5-μl suspension (dilution 6) used for DNA extraction (3,480 microorganisms/ml). All PCRs were performed in triplicate. Images show dilutions of T. whipplei stained with SYTO 9. At higher resolution (upper left image), single T. whipplei cells are visible but most bacteria form inconclusive clusters. Therefore, images at lower resolution were used for quantification through digital image analysis using daime software as described previously (13, 14). Representative images of dilutions 1 to 3 are shown (3 upper right images). Bars, 5 μm.

References

    1. Marth T, Schneider T. 2008. Whipple disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 24:141–148 - PubMed
    1. Rolain JM, Fenollar F, Raoult D. 2007. False positive PCR detection of Tropheryma whipplei in the saliva of healthy people. BMC Microbiol. 7:48.10.1186/1471-2180-7-48 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edouard S, Fenollar F, Raoult D. 2012. The rise of Tropheryma whipplei: a 12-year retrospective study of PCR diagnoses in our reference center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:3917–3920 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maibach RC, Altwegg M. 2003. Cloning and sequencing an unknown gene of Tropheryma whipplei and development of two LightCycler PCR assays. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 46:181–187 - PubMed
    1. Hinrikson HP, Dutly F, Nair S, Altwegg M. 1999. Detection of three different types of ‘Tropheryma whippelii' directly from clinical specimens by sequencing, single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and type-specific PCR of their 16S-23S ribosomal intergenic spacer region. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49:1701–1706 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources