Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 31;26(1):48-52.

Primary triage of mass burn casualties with associated severe traumatic injuries

Affiliations

Primary triage of mass burn casualties with associated severe traumatic injuries

B Atiyeh et al. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. .

Abstract

A key aim in any mass disaster event is to avoid diverting resources by overwhelming specialized tertiary centers with minor casualties. The most crucial aspect of an effective disaster response is pre-hospital triage at the scene. Unfortunately, many triage systems have serious shortcomings in their methodologies and no existing triage system has enough scientific evidence to justify its universal adoption. Moreover, it is observed that the optimal approach to planning is by no means clear-cut and that each new incident involving burns appears to produce its own unique problems not all of which were predictable. In most major burns disasters, victims mostly have combined trauma burn injuries and form a heterogeneous group with a broad range of devastating injuries. Are these victims primarily burn patients or trauma patients? Should they be taken care of in a burn center or in a trauma center or only in a combined burns-trauma center? Who makes the decision? The present review is aimed at answering some of these questions.

Un objectif clé après les désastres de masse de tous les types est d’éviter le détournement des ressources submergeant les centres tertiaires spécialisés de patients atteints de lésions mineures. L’aspect le plus crucial d’une réponse efficace aux catastrophes est le triage préhospitalier à la scène de l’accident. Malheureusement, de nombreux systèmes de triage présentent de sérieuses lacunes dans leurs méthodologies et aucun système de triage actuellement utilisé ne démontre de posséder les qualités scientifiques suffisantes pour justifier son adoption universelle. Par ailleurs, on observe que l’approche optimale pour la planification n’est pas nullement claire et que tous les cas de désastre par feu présentent des aspects particuliers non tous prévisibles. Dans la plupart des grands désastres par feu, la majorité des victimes présentent une association de brûlures et d’autres traumatismes et constituent un groupe hétérogène atteint d’une large gamme de lésions dévastatrices. Ces victimes sont-elles principalement des patients brûlés ou des patients traumatisés? Faut-il les prendre en charge dans un centre des brûlés ou un centre des traumatisés ou seulement dans un centre dédié aux soins des deux catégories de patients? Qui prend la décision? Les Auteurs de cette étude mirent à répondre à certaines de ces questions.

Keywords: burn disaster; casualty triage; fire disaster; preparedness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seifman M, Ek EW, Menezes H, et al. Bushfire Disaster Burn Casualty Management. The Australian “Black Saturday” Bushfire Experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:460–3. - PubMed
    1. “The Management of Mass Burn Casualties and Fire Disasters”. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group; Dordrecht, The Netherlands,: 1995.
    1. Turris SA, Lund A. Triage during mass gatherings. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27:531–5. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins JL, McCarthy ML, Sauer LM, et al. Mass-casualty triage: Time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23:3–8. - PubMed
    1. Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN. Management of war-related burn injuries: Lessons learned from recent ongoing conflicts providing exceptional care in unusual places. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1529–37. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources