Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;98(12):970-4.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304271. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Hospital care of children with a cleft in England

Kate J Fitzsimons  1 , Lynn P Copley, Scott A Deacon, Jan H van der Meulen
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Hospital care of children with a cleft in England

Kate J Fitzsimons et al. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To analyse hospital admissions in the first 2 years of life among children with cleft lip and/or palate in England.

Design: Analysis of national administrative data of hospital admissions.

Setting: National Health Service hospitals.

Patients: Patients born alive between 1997 and 2008 who underwent surgical cleft repair.

Outcome measures: Number of admissions, including the birth episode, and days spent in hospital were examined. Children were analysed according to cleft type and whether or not they had additional congenital anomalies.

Results: 10 892 children were included. In their first 2 years, children without additional anomalies (n=8482) had on average 3.2 admissions and 13.2 days in hospital, which varied from 2.6 admissions and 9.2 days with cleft lip to 4.7 admissions and 19.7 days with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Children with additional anomalies (n=2410) had on average 6.7 admissions and 51.4 days in hospital, which varied from 6.4 admissions and 48.5 days with cleft palate to 8.8 admissions and 67.5 days with BCLP. The mean number and duration of cleft-related admissions was similar in children without (1.6 admissions and 6.4 days) and in those with additional anomalies (1.5 admissions and 8.5 days). 35.2% of children without additional anomalies had at least one emergency admission, whereas the corresponding figure was 67.3% with additional anomalies.

Conclusions: The burden of hospital care in the first 2 years of life varied according to cleft type and presence of additional anomalies. However, cleft-specific hospital care did not differ between children with and without additional anomalies.

Keywords: Administrative data; Children; Cleft lip and palate; Hospital admissions; Length of stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stanier P, Moore G. Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:R73–81 - PubMed
    1. CRANE Project team on behalf of the Cleft Development Group CRANE Database Annual Report 2011. London: Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2011
    1. World Health Organization, Human Genetics Programme World Atlas of Birth defects, 2nd edn Geneva: International Centre for Birth Defects (ICBD) of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems in collaboration with European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) in cooperation with Human Genetics Programme World Health Organization, 2003
    1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group Report of a CSAG Committee on cleft lip and/or palate. London: The Stationery Office, 1998
    1. Fitzsimons K, Mukarram S, Copley L, et al. Centralisation of services for children with cleft lip or palate in England: a study of hospital episode statistics. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:148. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types