The intermediate disturbance hypothesis is broadly defined, substantive issues are key: a reply to Sheil and Burslem

Affiliations

Comment

Jeremy W Fox. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct.

. 2013 Oct;28(10):572-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address: jefox@ucalgary.ca.

No abstract available

Comment on

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned.
Fox JW. Fox JW. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;28(2):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013. PMID: 22981468
Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox.
Sheil D, Burslem DF. Sheil D, et al. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;28(10):571-2. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013. PMID: 23953996 No abstract available.