Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;19(1):6-8.
doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101340. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Implementing GRADE: calculating the risk difference from the baseline risk and the relative risk

Affiliations

Implementing GRADE: calculating the risk difference from the baseline risk and the relative risk

Robert G Newcombe et al. Evid Based Med. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

A key step in implementing the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system is the estimation of a risk difference based on estimates of the baseline risk and the relative risk estimated from different sources. In this paper we describe a simple and effective method to calculate confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk difference for this situation. Whenever an independent source is available to estimate the baseline risk for the population to which the effect estimates should be applied, this source should be used and CIs for the absolute risk difference should be calculated taking all sources of uncertainty into account.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Statistics & Research Methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Absolute risk reduction (expressed as events prevented per 1000 women) for effect of low-dose, low-molecular-weight heparin on venous thrombolic events, from Bates et al. Four 95% CIs are shown, (A) representing imprecision of relative risk (RR) only, (B) imprecision of baseline risk (BR) only, (C) a correct interval using MOVER-R and (d) calculated directly from upper and lower limits for both BR and RR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Absolute risk difference (in %) for effect of low-dose bupivacaine on spinal anaesthesia efficacy, from Arzola and Wieczorek. Four 95% CIs are shown in figure 1.

References

    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:380–2 - PubMed
    1. Spencer FA, Iorio A, You J, et al. Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects. Br Med J 2012;345:e7401. - PubMed
    1. Deeks JJ. Issues in selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2002;21:1575–600 - PubMed
    1. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimating rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 1986;292:746–50 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd edn Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998