Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i61-6.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051038. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys

Brian V Fix  1 , Andrew Hyland, Richard J O'Connor, K Michael Cummings, Geoffrey T Fong, Frank J Chaloupka, Andrea S Licht
Affiliations

A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys

Brian V Fix et al. Tob Control. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Increases in tobacco taxes are effective in reducing tobacco consumption, but because of the addictive nature of cigarettes, smokers often seek out less expensive sources of cigarettes. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of cigarette packs that are untaxed by the state in which the participant resides in a sample of US smokers at two time points.

Methods: Data for this study were taken from the 2009 and 2010 waves of the International Tobacco Control United States Survey. Members of this nationally representative cohort of smokers were invited to send us an unopened pack of their usual brand of cigarettes.

Results: In 2009, 318 packs were received from 401 eligible participants (79%). In 2010, 366 packs were received from 491 eligible participants (75%). In total, 20% of the packs in 2009 and 21% in 2010 were classified as untaxed by the participant's state of residence. The prevalence of untaxed cigarettes was higher in states with higher-excise taxes. Smokers who do not have a plan to quit were significantly more likely to have sent back a pack that was classified as untaxed by the participant's state of residence.

Conclusions: One in five packs were untaxed with rates higher in states with higher-excise taxes. It is unclear whether these estimates differ from the actual prevalence of cigarettes that are untaxed by a smoker's state of residence. Harmonisation of excise tax rates across all 50 US states might be one method of reducing or eliminating the incentive to avoid or evade these taxes.

Keywords: Economics; Price; Taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of packs classified as untaxed by the participant’s state of residence by outlet type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21:172–180. - PubMed
    1. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 1999. Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco.
    1. Levy DT, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model. Prev Med. 2000;31:279–286. - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The Economics of Smoking. In: Culyer CJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of Health Economics 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2000. pp. 1539–1627.
    1. Frieden TR, Mostashari F, Kerker BD, et al. Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002–2003. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1016–1023. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types