Adverse events recorded in English primary care: observational study using the General Practice Research Database
- PMID: 23972194
- PMCID: PMC3722830
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670660
Adverse events recorded in English primary care: observational study using the General Practice Research Database
Abstract
Background: More accurate and recent estimates of adverse events in primary care are necessary to assign resources for improvement of patient safety, while predictors must be identified to ameliorate patient risk.
Aim: To determine the incidence of recorded iatrogenic harm in general practice and identify risk factors for these adverse events.
Design and setting: Cross-sectional sample of 74,763 patients at 457 English general practices between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2008, obtained from the General Practice Research Database.
Method: Patient age at study entry, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, practice region, duration registered at practice, continuity of care, comorbidities, and health service use were extracted from the data. Adverse events were defined by Read Codes for complications of care (Chapters S, T, and U). Crude and adjusted analyses were performed by Poisson regression, using generalised estimating equations.
Results: The incidence was 6.0 adverse events per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.74 to 6.27), equivalent to eight adverse events per 10,000 consultations (n = 2,540,877). After adjustment, patients aged 65-84 years (risk ratio [RR] = 5.62, 95% CI = 4.58 to 6.91; P<0.001), with the most consultations (RR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.60 to 2.86; P<0.001), five or more emergency admissions (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.60; P<0.001), or the most diseases according to expanded diagnosis clusters (RR = 8.46, 95% CI = 5.68 to 12.6; P<0.001) were at greater risk of adverse events. Patients registered at their practice for the longest periods of time were less at risk of an adverse event (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.47; P<0.001).
Conclusion: The low incidence of recorded adverse events is comparable with other studies. Temporal sequencing of risk factors and case ascertainment would benefit from data triangulation. Future studies may explore whether first adverse events predict future incidents.
Figures
References
-
- Makeham M, Dovey S, Runciman W, Larizgoitia I. Methods and Measures Working Group of the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. Methods and measures used in primary care patient safety research. Results of a literature review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
-
- Sandars J, Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: Understanding the diversity across studies. Fam Pract. 2003;20(3):231–236. - PubMed
-
- Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):370–376. - PubMed
-
- Fischer G, Fetters MD, Munro AP, Goldman EB. Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database. J Fam Pract. 1997;45(1):40–46. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources