Studies of pain management in osteoarthritis: bedside to policy
- PMID: 23973140
- PMCID: PMC3886126
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.013
Studies of pain management in osteoarthritis: bedside to policy
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating chronic condition requiring long-term treatment of pain and functional impairment. Our objective was to characterize studies addressing management of OA-related pain with respect to the breadth of interventions, trial duration and size, outcome measures, and funding sources.
Design: We identified studies focused on 'pain' and 'osteoarthritis' from ClinicalTrals.gov and abstracted data on study status, sample size, design, funding source, duration, outcomes measured, and interventions evaluated. We examined associations among intervention type, funding source, sample size, duration, and outcomes measured.
Results: We identified 287 registered studies, of which 69% investigated pharmacologic interventions, 11% behavioral interventions, and 5% surgical procedures or devices, while the remainder examined other types of interventions. Eighty-seven percent evaluated knee OA. The average sample size was 290 subjects and average study duration was 7.4 months, with 52% using durations ≤3 months and 21% ≥12 months. Industry funded 64% of studies, either fully or partially. Of 180 completed studies, 139 were pharmacologic studies. Of these, 34 (24%) posted results to the registry. Among the studies funded by industry, 60% had durations ≤3 months as compared with 36% among non-industry funded studies (P < 0.0001). Behavioral intervention trials tended to be of longer duration than pharmacologic trials and were less likely to be funded by industry.
Conclusion: Over half of OA pain studies and >80% of those funded by industry used trial durations of less than 6 months. Future studies should take into consideration the need for long-term pain management for OA when designing trial protocols.
Keywords: Clinical trials; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Registry.
Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any conflict of interest with respect to the context of this paper.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2008.
-
- Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability Among Adults - United States, 2005. Vol. 2009 Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; May 1, 2009. - PubMed
-
- Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):635–646. - PubMed
-
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed November 12, 2012];2010 http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
