Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 23;3(8):e003311.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003311.

Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences--lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study

Maarten de Wit  1 , Tineke Abma, Marije Koelewijn-Van Loon, Sarah Collins, John Kirwan
Affiliations

Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences--lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study

Maarten de Wit et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Several studies have provided insights into the conditions for successful patient involvement in health research. We recently demonstrated that long-term engagement with people with rheumatic conditions in international outcome research led to significant changes in the research agenda in the field of rheumatology. This article explores facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients as collaborative partners at five Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences.

Design: Responsive evaluation, starting with a thematic document analysis of conference proceedings and the grey literature, followed by 38 qualitative interviews. Interview transcripts were subjected to inductive content analysis.

Setting: 5 international OMERACT conferences between 2002 and 2012.

Participants: Patient delegates (n=16) and professional delegates representing researchers (n=14), pharmaceutical industry and regulators (n=2).

Results: Combined review of the document analysis and interview data revealed five main facilitators and three main barriers. Patient engagement as full participants at OMERACT conferences was enhanced by: strong leadership commitment and the presence of change agents, a clear selection procedure, an inclusive consensus-based conference design, individualised and self-organised support, an interactive and encouraging moderation style during discussion groups. Barriers were related to the intensity of the conference programme, scepticism among researchers and doubts about the representativeness of the patient group.

Conclusions: This study concludes that developing a sustainable structure for funding, selection and support of patient delegates, as well as adjusting conference design and moderation style, contributes not only towards facilitating direct dialogue between all stakeholders but also towards enhancing mutual understanding and the successful incorporation of the patient perspective in an outcome conference such as OMERACT.

Keywords: Qualitative Research; Rheumatology; Social Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. O'Connell MP. Positioning impact on the surgical patient. Nurs Clin North Am 2006;41:173–92, v. - PubMed
    1. PatientPartner Patient involvement in clinical research. A guide for sponsors and investigators. Soest: VSOP, 2011
    1. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010;26:334–40 - PubMed
    1. Gagnon MP, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, et al. Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 2006;76:156–68 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources